Hon. Howard H. Shore See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Diego County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.0 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Howard H. Shore


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA56395
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This puke did not act alone he could not have done it without the dullards Andrew and Phillip Haskett. Always need a corrupt attorneys who are willing to orchestate a civil rights violation. Phillip and Andrew Hasket never faced any reprocussions for the harm they caused to an innocent person. All three should rot in hell

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA56392
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Do not tell me that everyone did not know the corruption and abuse of power Shore exhibited during his judgeship. He should have been removed as many other also should have. The devastation Shore and others at that same court house caused is insurmountable. They do not monitor judges. the CJP is useless. How many innocent lives were ruined because of these sociopaths. Shore will never abuse his power again but was never held responsible for the damage he did to Jonathan Sussman and many other. He should be in prison with others who know who they are at that court . they are all covert narcisists. Very frightening. So the filthy scum bag got embarrassed big deal. That is no punishment for what he has done. As far as the thank God its friday bit what do you expect he loves feeeling he got away with something. The thrill of being able to work only a four day week and get paid for a five is a psychopaths dream.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA56328
Rating:10.0
Comments:
This is what happened he assigned Philip and Stephen Haskett to repesent my indigent brothe so they could and would collude with Shore. he set the stage. He discriminates agaisnt psychiatric patients as well as blacks. Noone was paying the Hasketts they did not even call one independent witness for Jon. Shore needs to go to prison. I was at the empty cradle with Shore when his daughter was still born 41 year prior. It not nothiing to do with driving to see his son on Shabbot. He tried to garner sympathy for an unrelated event

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA56143
Rating:10.0
Comments:
JUdge did recuse for my CCP 170.1. He is such a special person reducing his case load to monday through thursday . He just will take Fridays off. He makes the rules .He needs to go to prison , Shabbot dinner are specvial in prison. No one noticed he was not there for one and one half years?

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA28579
Rating:1.0
Comments:
this is not a judge . had a conservator's hearing with paramedics and a gurney in the room for the jury to see. only issue is gravely disabled. what would a jury think based upon that alone.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8728
Rating:1.1
Comments:
case is in appeals dept and Shore is being appealed, Shore keeps bring legal file back to his dept apparently he has no other cases as no one else would be stupid enough to have him as a Judge so he wants to sanitize the record. Leave the case in Civil Shore.

Other

Comment #: CA8217
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Howard Shore is retaliating against 'you' by making someone 'gravely disabled' when this person is not. [redacted by Ed.] Howard Shore is greatly disabled if you want my input. Terrible judge stay away from him.