"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Kimberley B. Guillemet

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CA44991
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Terrible judge lacking the skill set and judicial knowledge to be a n effective judge. Too worried about external events and not paying attention to her own court. Incompetent to say the least!

Other

Comment #: CA40660
Rating:2.0

Comments:
Judge Kimberley Guillemet is a fourth amendment violator extreme, pro-prosecution to the max. Serious rights violations happens in her courtroom daily.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA33489
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Kimberley Baker Guillemet has destroyed my faith in our judicial system. [redacted by Ed.] Kimberley Baker Guillemet lied about having read my pleadings before an August 2020 hearing and it was absolutely clear that she had only read the prosecutor's pleadings. Because I had been transferred to Guillemet after the previous judge, Rene Gilbertson, also demonstrably failed to read my pleadings, I reprinted pages of the case law in my pleadings - Guillemet didn't even have to look it up since it was reprinted in the pleadings. I mentioned in the pleadings that I had found my case law from the Bench Notes of the applicable CalCrim and that it was indisputable law. In my reply brief, I made it crystal clear that I had erred in not entitling my pleadings as a Habeas petition. Despite this, Guillemet had absolutely no comprehension of the legal basis of my pleadings and instead called it a "1385 Motion", moronically deciding instead that Penal Code §1385 was the basis. When I tried to get rid of this lazy lying judge, Kimberley Baker Guillemet began her cover up. She blocked my CCP §170.1 declaration and misdirected me to file my responsive writ in the Appeals Court instead of the Appellate Division of the LASC, so that my writ ended up being filed a day late and rejected [Redacted] Then, when I filed a CRC Rule 4.551 declaration regarding my never considered Habeas petition, Kimberley Baker Guillemet instructed her toady clerk to not send the 4.551 declaration to the Presiding Judge. When I filed a declaration regarding this suppression, Guillemet lied and claimed that Local Rule 8.33(a) empowered her to act in the stead of the Presiding Judge and she, Guillemet, then re-ruled on my pleadings, now calling them a Habeas petition. In doing so, she lied about how she had previously ruled and revised history by basing her denial on that lie. Her claim that Local Rule 8.33(a) applied is an absolute lie, as the rule says nothing of the sort. Thankfully, she was transferred to a different department, but she should be removed from the bench [Redacted]