Comment #: CA52929
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I will tell you what is truth about this judge and i watched 9 cases before which i believe she was correct and fair ! Now i was not happy with her before because she didnt allow evidence as i had witnesses there who took off work so i got a peremptory challenge when i got in court we came to an agreement that she would be fair and allow evidence which she did And after the 9 cases which i deemed fair because she heard both sides and showed no prejudice or bias which i cant say for all judges here many going on heresay opinions and lies and its guilt by accusation not facts evidence and truth she listened without bias prejudice ideology party affiliation i will ask for her again because i have another case there which is contrary with laws in question i will commend judge Charlick even though i didnt get everything and i hold her accountable if my ex endangers my son in the future because she made that ruling i have no criminal record actually outstanding record with the police and im a good father im a christian attend church regularly and teach my son to love and obey the lord my ex is a worldly person materialistic and lies ! there is a supreme god a heaven and a hell and it doesnt matter who believes it because we are all judged not by this worldly standard but by gods son jesus record i got to critique and to preach ! not heresay and opinion but facts and truth !

Comment #: CA52705
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I read all these comments before my first hearing. I thought surely a judge wouldn't be so emotionally governed. I was WRONG. Every review on this page is correct. She even stated that she was going against the documented information and using her discretion because she could. The opposing party lied, to which there was established and documented proof of their inaccuracies, and she changed topics. She misunderstood the facts she read, and when corrected, she brushed it off stating she didn't have time to read every document, so she was using her discretion. Even when presented with the proper code or case law, which she states she is well aware of, she relies on her discretion. That word comes up a lot in her hearings. If you get this judge and you don't fall within the parameters of her ideology you better have a plan B. Also, it might be good to have a thick skin because she will make off-handed comments that are baseless and personally degrading in manner. My second hearing was just as bad, so it's not her having an off or bad day.

Comment #: CA52180
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
`There is nothing honorable about this judge She is biased and prejudiced and is governed by her emotions and feelings toward someone, her ideology and political party IF they could give a rating under 1 she would have that She doesnt want to hear the truth, the facts or witnesses She is a disgrace! you cant get a fair hearing from her and her friendship with other horrible biased judges are used in her decision making

Comment #: CA49353
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge is by far the worst judges here in San Diego. After many delays because of my ex husband, we finally went to trial. I submitted important pieces of evidence, some docs were sealed (CWS report), to this judge and they were NEVER opened or reviewed. Yet again, my ex husband played the victim and without submitting any evidence still got his way. She needs to be fired or reevaluated to see if this role is a proper fit for her. Never sees things for how they are, rules on her discretion. People that are supposed to enforce the law, need to do a better job at doing just that - enforcing the law. There is no way that this should be happening.

Comment #: CA47773
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I agree with the 2/29/2023 and the 2/2/2023 post. This judge clearly did not read any of the paperwork my attorney files. She read my soon to be ex's documents and made a judgement about me based on his story only. She never took my side of the story in account. She has left my family in a dangerous position and forcing us to move for our safety.
Based on how she behaved in court and her hostile behavior towards me I can only assume she has a son who went through a high conflict divorce and she is punishing women trying to leave their high conflict divorce.

Comment #: CA46402
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Used her discretion upon making her judgment on my domestic violence case. My attorney advised that I seek information on an appeal. Too much evidence proving my case was NOT taking into account, nor did my ex-husband bring anything to help support his argument. She still ruled in his favor twice. There was electronic stalking, harassment, and threats that were made and she still felt that I did not meet my burden. Even though I submitted evidence proving otherwise. The law is the law and these people in power are supposed to follow the law, not use their discretion. There is so much more to my story, but not enough space to write.

Comment #: CA46338
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Agree with the post of 1/5/22. She definitely does not read the documents submitted with the court and does not care a lick regarding the CRC and CCP. She does not appear to have any regard for a parent that moves out of state to better their situation (as we all know, Divorce is financially devastating). Made a change order to a judgment that hadn't even been accepted by the court. Does not care about what any non-attorney party has to say. Rules on whim. Makes commentary that she can't back up. The only thing you can do is laugh at her rulings, even when they are unfair to you.

Comment #: CA38603
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Unprofessional, needs to be fired. Shows up late to work all the time. Never reads documents and gives a fair trail. Also makes consistent unprofessional remarks.