Hon. Janet M. Frangie See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
San Bernardino County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.3 - 6 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Janet M. Frangie


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA46476
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Janet M. Frangie is a racist judge who is bias to white litigants, uisng abusive power to act above the law. She is toxic to society causing vulnerable and innocent plaintiffs massive harm and lifeless. She must be removed from the bench ASAP.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA38638
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Years ago, I tried a case out in RC in which Judge Frangie presided. I thought she was awesome. A really good judge. She has a tough, kind of firmness to her, a bit of no nonsense to her personality, but I don't mind that. Her ability to grasp complex subjects wes superb. In our case, it was about corporate law on involuntary dissolutions--but she got right in there, totally engaged, , and took interest in the facts. It was a fun case to try, especially since the other side was a bit odd and did some amusing things that revealed a lack of experience. She was smooth, even as she would occasionally shoot me a roll of the eyes. I am pleased to see she is still a judge out there and I do hold her in high regard. A good judge!!

Prosecutor

Comment #: CA27055
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Judge Frangie is a disgrace to the bench. She seems to buy into the pro-criminal mentality that has spread across California and routinely rules in ways that put dangerous criminals back on the streets. She seems to go into cases having predetermined the result she wants.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA25068
Rating:8.5
Comments:
An exceptionally able judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA16379
Rating:2.1
Comments:
A disgrace to the bench. Not familiar with case details. Failure to distinguish case law precedent and apply them as required. Extremely pro corporate parties. Makes disparaging remarks frequently.

Other

Comment #: CA6631
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Frangie appears to be a racist, bias against african american's in her courtroom, beware because you wont recieve a fair trial.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA4187
Rating:9.9
Comments:
Judge Frangie was excellent as a trial judge. Fair to both sides, flexible, but wants to keep things moving, which is great. She will do her own research on particular issues in order to get the correct ruling. She lets the lawyers try their case. She isn't afraid to change her mind on a limine ruling after seeing how the trial is progressing. She is everything that one could ask for in a trial judge.

Other

Comment #: CA1598
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Treats people with dgnity and respect.