Hon. James R. Nowlin See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
W.D.Tex.  
Average Rating:7.9 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. James R. Nowlin


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 10544
Rating:9.8
Comments:
Had this Judge for a jury trial. Excellent demeanor at trial and very fair and even handed with objections. The Judge "helped" both sides by "suggesting" objections at various points through the trial when the evidence was getting redundant.

Took a LONG time to get a ruling on our motion for summary judgment. The ruling issued less than a week before trial and significantly altered our trial strategy.

Not flexible about scheduling. Despite asking the attorneys about "convenient" times for the trial, trial was scheduled during inconvenient times for both counsel and over one week earlier than scheduled in the scheduling order.