Hon. G. Thomas Eisele See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
E.D.Ark.  
Average Rating:8.8 - 9 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. G. Thomas Eisele


Comments


Other

Comment #: 11527
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Hon. G. Thomas Eisele is a very good judge. He has been on the bench long enough to discern from the truth and lies even in the most complicated cases. He's very compassionate and very thorough and very intelligent. It was an honor to be in his courtroom. We are fortunate to have him on the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 6587
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Judge Eisele has served as an excellent federal judge for nearly four decades, but his age is becoming a factor. He is one of the best.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 4709
Rating:10.0
Comments:
He has been a judge for 40 years; there is nobody better. He handled an immensely complicated capital case in 1998-99 with law review-quality pretrial orders on really complicated stuff, all of which came out in short order, well-reasoned. He should not retire; we could do worse.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 3564
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Appointed by Nixon in 1969, he was a liberal Republican. Now on senior status, he still handles a full load. In hugely complex death penalty case trial with about 20 pretrial motions, he generated law review quality and exhautive opinions on every issue in the case and did not publish any. Has no ego, a compassionate man, a super intellect, grasps issues quickly and always sees both sides, lets lawyers try their cases, always a pleasure to work with. It is an honor to be in his court.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 3258
Rating:4.3
Comments:
This judge has been an excellent judge in the past. However, he has grown older, and, with age, he has delegated more work to his clerks, resulting in less scholarly results. He should retire now.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2178
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Very fair, applies the law, and does not "homer" out-of-state lawyers. No apparent bias vs. plaintiffs or defendants.

Prosecutor

Comment #: 1620
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
An excellent judge. Is always fair, to both the defense and the prosecutors. Just firmly sticks to the rule that the government has the burden of proof.