Hon. Harold D. Vietor See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:No Rating - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. Harold D. Vietor



Comment #: 21180
It is hard to believe that someone who is a federal judge only takes into consideration what he reads in your P.S.R. and what the prosecutor has stated about the defendant, without even trying to filter out the inflated, embellished, over-dramatized rhetoric brought to bear against the defendant. People should be judged as individuals, and not grouped into a category which does not represent the character of any one person. The Honorable H.D. Vietor is blinded by the federal sentencing guidelines, and does not deviate from them at all. (This statement is just my opinion.)


Comment #: 21120
This judge did not take the law into account after undeniable evidence of the police lying, destroying evidence, etc. After a motion to suppress was denied, he took off his glasses and looked at the detectives who lied, covered up, and destroyed evidence and said: "If this ever happens in my courtroom again, I'm going to raise my eyebrows!" If this ever happens again? A young man and his whole future gone, violations of human liberty thrown out the window, but if it ever happens again, he will raise his eyebrows next time? How someone who is supposed to uphold the law and the Constitution can sit as a federal judge like that and get away with that ruling is beyond belief. I feel sorry for America. (Just my own opinion.)