Hon. Ann Montgomery See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.Minn.  
Average Rating:6.4 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Ann Montgomery


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21776
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I like Judge Montgomery.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 18966
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Excellent, pleasant judge.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12614
Rating:2.8
Comments:
One of the worst judges for employees or consumers in the District. Most decisions are pro corporation. Shameful jurist. Very disappointing to many of those who were happy to see her appointed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12557
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Pleasant but a near total disaster. Plays favorites with supposed luminaries of the local Bar - - let one of them completely slide on conduct that would have gotten anyone else sanctioned. You can forget about a level playing field. Ignores urgent applications and then flagrantly disregards solid precedent (in the most transparently intellectually dishonest fashion) in an effort to do what she thinks will force a settlement and make everyone go away. Arrogant, know-it-all law clerk. Very, very disappointing experience.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12240
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Good, fair and pleasant judge. Somewhat conservative but open minded and tries to follow the applicable precedent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 11822
Rating:2.2
Comments:
This judge is absolutely awful for plaintiffs in civil rights cases. She has a high rate of ordering summary judgment in favor of defendants. Stay away from this judge if you represent an individual- seriously.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 5720
Rating:8.2
Comments:
Conservative. Very strict about laying foundation and following all rules at trial, but fair at trial (if you make it to trial).

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 4917
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Living proof of the Peter Principle - was a much better magistrate than real judge.