Hon. Timothy D. DeGiusti See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
W.D.Okla.  
Average Rating:9.8 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Timothy D. DeGiusti


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 35452
Rating:10.0
Comments:
One of the truly great jurists. A "teaching judge" to young lawyers who will take the time to help coach and mold young lawyers in their courtroom advocacy. He will "bridge the gap" from what he sees as a judge and what young lawyers think is happening.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 8854
Rating:9.7
Comments:
New judge who is taking his job very seriously but still remembers being a lawyer. He is working very hard. Although the bar believed he would be very conservative on the bench, there is no appearance of any ideological bent. I would be happy to have any type of case before him (plaintiff, defense or commercial). The notion that he is somehow less qualified than others (because his father-in-law is the former Judge Thompson who got him the job) is not fair to his very strong early work as a judge. Also, don't think you can push him around because he is a new judge.