Hon. John E. McDermott See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
C.D.Cal.  
Average Rating:6.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. John E. McDermott


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 26631
Rating:4.7
Comments:
I've practiced in front of many federal judges, and Judge McDermott is, in my opinion, one of the worst, if not the worst I've experienced. His temperament is poor, first and foremost, and inconsistent. One hearing, he will be gruff and angry, and the next, he will be perfectly fine and cordial. More concerning, the rulings on discovery, in particular, are very inconsistent. There was one instance where the ruling was so misguided that it had to be appealed to the District Court Judge for purposes of preserving it for appeal to the Ninth Circuit (the case settled, so it became moot). I suspect that his Clerk has wide authority to decide many of these issues on her own, or with limited oversight, and that may also play a role. Also, his chambers are "dark" very often. "Dark" is code for "unavailable." There were at least two instances of "dark" chambers for at least three weeks of time. Maybe there is a good reason, like a medical issue or something unknown to the public, but if there isn't "good cause" for it, then he's just frankly not doing his job. No one is completely devoid of merit, of course, and I will say that there were instances where Judge McDermott had a good understanding of the issues during hearings, but, again, there were some inconsistencies. He was also punctual for hearings.

In short, this is a Judge that is largely inconsistent, poorly tempered, incorrect in many rulings, and often unavailable. Not good.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 18405
Rating:7.3
Comments:
Has a stern demeanor, but is compassionate. Has a good grasp of legal issues.