Comment #: 35695
Rating:5.5
Comments:
Judge fabricated issue with me at family court regarding zoom call in January lied about waiting for me to return from pages saying I dd not have lawyer and leaving zoom call total bs should complain his actions to law society of ontario

Comment #: 35690
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Forms an opinion based on preliminary information. Once his mind is made up that is that, regardless of contradictory facts. Extremely one sided. Fairness and facts don’t seem to matter

Comment #: 33388
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This dofuss is old and cranky; intelligent, but fails to apply it; he retired to the bench because he had nowhere else to go; inconsistent rulings; often lazy; very strange.

Comment #: 26631
Rating:4.7
Comments:
I've practiced in front of many federal judges, and Judge McDermott is, in my opinion, one of the worst, if not the worst I've experienced. His temperament is poor, first and foremost, and inconsistent. One hearing, he will be gruff and angry, and the next, he will be perfectly fine and cordial. More concerning, the rulings on discovery, in particular, are very inconsistent. There was one instance where the ruling was so misguided that it had to be appealed to the District Court Judge for purposes of preserving it for appeal to the Ninth Circuit (the case settled, so it became moot). I suspect that his Clerk has wide authority to decide many of these issues on her own, or with limited oversight, and that may also play a role. Also, his chambers are "dark" very often. "Dark" is code for "unavailable." There were at least two instances of "dark" chambers for at least three weeks of time. Maybe there is a good reason, like a medical issue or something unknown to the public, but if there isn't "good cause" for it, then he's just frankly not doing his job. No one is completely devoid of merit, of course, and I will say that there were instances where Judge McDermott had a good understanding of the issues during hearings, but, again, there were some inconsistencies. He was also punctual for hearings.

In short, this is a Judge that is largely inconsistent, poorly tempered, incorrect in many rulings, and often unavailable. Not good.

Comment #: 18405
Rating:7.3
Comments:
Has a stern demeanor, but is compassionate. Has a good grasp of legal issues.