Hon. Lucy H. Koh See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
N.D.Cal.  
Average Rating:4.3 - 7 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Lucy H. Koh


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 22108
Rating:1.5
Comments:
The parties in our class action reached a tentative settlement over a year ago which she preliminary approved and then denied final approval and completely changed her position on issues that she specifically approved during the preliminary approval. This has caused unreasonable delay and the matter is still not approved due to her scheduling issues. Unacceptable.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21759
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Judge, in my opinion, should not be handling complex litigation. She has no knowledge regarding management of class actions and has not familiarized herself with the issues in our case.

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: 21603
Rating:3.0
Comments:
This judge was very much pro-plaintiff in my trial. She bent over backwards to twist the facts to suit the plaintiff's position. She failed to deem matters automatically admitted when the plaintiff failed to respond to my RFAs, she excluded my witness at trial when we agreed to offer her for depo, and she yelled at me for asking the court's basis for denying my Rule 50 motion, to name a few things. Also, in another case involving the USPS that I witnessed, the defense attorney won all of his arguments (I believe S of L or immunity), but she refused to rule until he tried to settle with the P. She has had no trial experience before coming to the bench, and it shows.

Litigant

Comment #: 21001
Rating:8.0
Comments:
This judge seems to be sincerely committed to litigants alleging violations of their civil and constitutional rights. She was able to refer to evidence submitted in the complaint — without looking — and took the time to conduct her own research prior to our hearing. She gave clear references to cases and laws that she considered when making a final judgement in a 42 U.S.C. 1983 case. She gave us the feeling that our complaint was honestly considered. The one thing that was difficult was standing in front of her. She does become irritated quickly and expresses those irritations rather openly. She also expresses understanding, but not quite as openly. I can't say I wouldn't say some of the things she has said to overly pushy lawyers in the course of the litigation.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 20970
Rating:5.8
Comments:
This judge does not relate well to legal issues outside her single area of expertise. She has no patience for details and case management issues in complex, multi-party cases.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 20685
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Did not familiarize herself with the law or the case before the hearing. Continued a simple hearing for several months.