Hon. Cathy L. Waldor See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
D.N.J.  
Average Rating:5.4 - 6 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Cathy L. Waldor


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 25744
Rating:9.5
Comments:
See my previous comment dated 7/10/2018.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 25743
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I am a plaintiffs lawyer, and I have appeared before Magis. Judge Waldor in several large and complex cases. I have found her to be knowledgeable and engaging. In one case, she mediated a multi-million dollar settlement, persisting over ten mediation sessions to get it done.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21037
Rating:2.1
Comments:
Incredibly biased. Very pro-defense, pro-big firm, yet is usually unprepared or unaware of the law. Makes horrible decisions and maintains no consistency since she doesn't keep a record of her decisions. Be warned.

Litigant

Comment #: 18981
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In case 02-12-cv-01879 (ES)(CLW) this Judge lost the boat of justice. Justice was turning over her head.
She never ruled on the case even though the case itself involved among other things elder abuse.
She could be a good candidate for impeachment of the grounds of her conduct regarding the above cited case