Hon. William Francis Kuntz II See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
E.D.N.Y.  
Average Rating:9.7 - 2 rating(s) Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
Comments



  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. William Francis Kuntz II


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 19927
Rating:9.7
Comments:
Judge Kuntz was a pleasure to argue a case before. He was genuinely interested in the very complex legal and regulatory issues in our case, asked tough questions of both sides at oral argument, and obviously had really dug into the issues as part of reaching his decisions in the case. I wish more judges took their cases as seriously as he does.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 18677
Rating:9.8
Comments:
A pleasure to try a case in front of. Treated the lawyers and litigants with respect, and seemed fo really enjoy being a judge. Handled conferences and evidentiary issues concisely, directly, and with no BS. Repeatedly compared himself to James Earl Jones, which was amusing.