The Robing Room

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:	(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:	(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:	(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:	(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:	(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:	(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:	(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling	(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail	(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:	(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:	(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:	(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:	(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:	(1=10%,10=100%)
Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Richard G. Andrews

Comments

Court Staff

Comment #: 35183
Rating:1.0

Comments:
this administrative Judge blocked a surrender of Adverse Claim to State as usufruct, withholding the reversionary interest from the account of the United States Treasury, in violation of the Trading with the Enemy Act [TWEA]; causing harm, injury and loss to a peaceful civilian who is granted innocent passage and peaceful use and enjoyment of the land in exchange for the surrender of the reversionary interest to the Treasury for the good of the Nation; this man, acting as an Article IV administrative Judge (executive branch) is guilty of treason, for blocking a surrender done in good faith, and needs to be removed from Office immediately;

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: 35172
Rating:1.0

Comments:
One word; Incompetent
Judge Andrews displayed his lack of understanding of the Heller and Bruen decisions in his recent anti second amendment decision (22-951). His error will be swiftly corrected by a more competent court. His decision has zero chance of standing. Ha, what a bumbling illogical fool.