Hon. Troy L. Nunley See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:5.9 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Troy L. Nunley



Comment #: 25304
Rating:Not Rated
Does this judge rule on the merits or biased towards any Court of Appeal Justice "friends"?

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: 23529
Fair, reasonable judge who follows the law

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21483
I observed a hearing in which this judge presiding on a TRO application that meant a lot to a plaintiff who was in danger of losing a house. This judge had not read the papers, and falsely accused plaintiff's counsel of not having included an important element. The plaintiff's counsel then pointed out the supposedly missing element, by page and line. This seemingly only angered the judge more; he then falsely accused the plaintiff's counsel of having an "attitude." It was the rudest display of temper and ego that I have ever seen in a federal courtroom. Perhaps his life tenure appointment has gone to his head. Whatever others' experiences with him, on this occasion he acted like a rude and petty tyrant. He could have denied the TRO application without shouting at and belittling the plaintiff's counsel.