Hon. Loretta C. Biggs See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:2.3 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Loretta C. Biggs


Court Staff

Comment #: 33598
Her conduct is very unprofessional as if she's trying out for court tv. She seems very prejudice toward defendents that are not represented by attorneys she's fond of. She rushes defendents testimony, cut attorneys off during cross examinations, then spend majority of the 5 mins she gives to a case ridiculing the defendent. Didn't see justice in her courtroom since she didn't give each side the same opportunity to lay out their case. It was evident she had her ruling made up at the time she rejected the request for continuance.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 29477
It takes this judge a ridiculously long time to rule on motions. She rarely entertains oral argument, even in substantial and complex cases involving dispositive motions. On balance, a disappointment.