Hon. Owen M. Panner See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.Or.  
Average Rating:3.2 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Owen M. Panner


Comments


Prosecutor

Comment #: 12071
Rating:3.2
Comments:
Easy reversal for the 9th circuit on a sexual register case. Seems like Judge Panner refused to order a CONVICTED sex offender to register as a sex offender because he thought his conduct was negligible and wasnt likely to offend again. The govt appealed and even the 9th curcuit had to summarliy reverse.

Defendant does not dispute that his conviction makes him a sex offender, rendering § 3563(a)(8)’s registration requirement applicable to him.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 09-30135 Plaintiff-Appellant, JEFFREY DEAN FERNANDES, Defendant-Appellee.