Hon. Wilhelmina Marie Wright See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.Minn.  
Average Rating:5.0 - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Wilhelmina Marie Wright


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33292
Rating:5.0
Comments:
I'm saddened to say that Judge Wright has been a huge disappointment on the federal bench. Primarily, Judge Wright lacks actual understanding and involvement in her cases. Her questioning during oral argument is for show, and demonstrates a clear dearth of knowledge regarding the record. She obviously relies on her law clerks far too often, and consistently demonstrates a lack of understanding regarding the law and the relevant facts. Her disrespect of her role as an Article III judge, as demonstrated by her failure to actually do the requisite work, stands in sharp contrast to most of the D. Minn. bench.