Hon. James van Meerveld See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
E.D.La.  
Average Rating:2.6 - 13 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. James van Meerveld


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33745
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased, incompetent. Uses arrogance to hide her insecurities and incompetency.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33643
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Still has not improved since she’s been on the bench

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33461
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I laughed at the post about how wonderful she is. I suspect that the person submitting that post was advantaged by her bias and took advantage of an opponent. That is not impartial justice. She is incompetent.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33433
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Not sure if the comments below are from someone with a specific agenda, but she is fantastic. She handled one particularly complex and contentious case and was incredibly patient, and worked a lot of hours to put together a fair settlement, and handled a ton of discovery disputes along the way promptly and fairly.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 33423
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Still incompetent

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 33038
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Another display of favoritism in a settlement conference. Complicated matter but her obvious effort to ignore the compl x issues at the expense of the plaintiff. Tried to protect a lawyer defendant that committed malpractice

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 33017
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Incompetent, incompetent, incompetent. Should have never been chosen for this position.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 32905
Rating:3.0
Comments:
No idea what she’s doing. Covers her incompetence with arrogance. Remind me of judge Ronnie wicker. A poor selection

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: 32812
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Lack of experience and knowledge. Poor judicial temperament due to her insecurity. Lashes out to disguise her incompetency. A poor selection by the court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 31501
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Poor attitude. Maskeds lack of knowledge and experience with condescending arrogance. A very poor selection.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 30001
Rating:2.2
Comments:
As an insurance defense lawyer I was shocked at how she treated plaintiff’s counsel in a settlement conference. She showed us certain things that led me to believe she was helping us to the detriment of the plaintiff. I worry about when it will be my client’s turn to be victimized by her biased actions. She was a mistake to be appointed to this job.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 29987
Rating:2.7
Comments:
Lack of experience masked by arrogance. The worst magazine started judge ever in the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 29983
Rating:3.5
Comments:
She is clearly biased and unskilled in personal injury litigation. She fails to recognize conflicts of interest. This stems
From a lack of real world experience and a bias toward corporate America. I believe she is insomnia and arrogant believing she knows more than she does. She steps over the line on talking to clients advocating on behalf of defendant.