Hon. Michael Lawrence Brown See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

Please type what you see below:


What others have said about Hon. Michael Lawrence Brown



Comment #: 34365
My civil case in Judge Browns court was a true travesty of justice. Judge was very biased against this injured plaintiff at trial.Judge took no action against defendants who clearly falsified documents(Fraud on the Court) and
they had committed perjury numerous times. I reported these and attorney misconduct issues to the Judge in my post trial pleadings. My former attorney had lied at least 4 times, falsely stating he had talked to jurors after trial and that they supposedly told him
many negative things about this plaintiff. The attorney finally admitted to the Court this was false(only after evidence surfaced that proved he had lied). Instead of reporting this misconduct and many other examples of misconduct I presented, and as outlined in Canon and ABA codes, Judge Brown writes an order/opinion that praises the attorney many times, as "Doing nothing wrong what so ever", and "nothing even close to doing anything wrong" and vilifies this plaintiff whistle blower instead. Judge also refused to let a neutral party contact the jurors about other false statements, to see if there may of been collusion between opposing parties. After everything I witnessed, and later the Judge saying many times "I can't remember" when misconduct examples were presented, it is my opinion this is a very dishonest and very biased Judge. It is just stunning that we have this stuff going on in US Federal Courts!


Comment #: 34114
I filed motions about professional misconduct along with physical evidence and this Judge refused to send the complaint and all the evidence to the chief judge as outlined in ABA rules, and also denied any sanctions. Further more He vilified me the whistle blower in his order. The Judge now seems to be aiding and abetting in the misconduct of the lawyers, and covering up for them. The Judge has made false statements to date as well. He was very biased against me through out the injury trial. I intend to file a formal Judaical misconduct complaint against Judge Brown. Others can read the overwhelming evidence presented,on pacer.com, Mitchell vs Dixie transport, GA Northern District. There was tons of misconduct through out this case. It is enough to make citizens lose all trust in our Federal Court system.

Court Staff

Comment #: 25674
This man is a raging racist. It is 2018 and I cannot believe that we are still having to deal with good old boys who think that minorities should not have rights. He open calls black lawyers "thugs" Black LAWYERS! not just criminal defendants are thugs according to him.