Hon. Richard A. Lanzillo See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
W.D.Pa.  
Average Rating:No Rating - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

    

What others have said about Hon. Richard A. Lanzillo


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: 34450
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Admitted to not reading exhibits/evidence that gave merit to the case. Pro Se Litigant had to file a Motion to Read Exhibits. The judge responded via snail mail within 2 working days that he read exhibits and closed the case. No justice. No accountability. Not worthy of one star. Disgrace to the Federal Court system and justice itself.

Litigant

Comment #: 33609
Rating:1.0
Comments:
[
redacted by Editor] Allowing Nunc Pro Tunc when opposing lawyer did not submit entry of appearance for approximately 4 months. Allowing opposing attorney to not submit brief when ordered on December 4, 2020 to have it in by December 10, 2020. Opposing attorney still has not filed brief. There is no accountability.