Hon. Martha Vazquez See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:6.4 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. Martha Vazquez


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 21652
Other judges should learn from her -- she's the best!


Comment #: 19582
So biased against the government that she is consistently flipped by the Circuit. Not fair minded or reasonable.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 19005
As former prosecutor and now criminal defense attorney I found Judge Vasquez to nothing but fair,professional,courteous and an excellent trial judge. I have tried cases all over the country(based in Philadelphia) and Judge Vasquez was a pleasure to have a trial in front of


Comment #: 17993
10th circuit had to overrule Vasquez yet again on a simple suppresion of evidence. The case is ALFREDO ARAGONES,V USA 11-2142. The Judge held
that for purposes of the Fourth Amendment the officer “seized” Mr. Aragones at the moment he ordered Mr. Aragones to remove his hand from his pocket. WRONG. He wasnt seized until the officer put him in cuffs. 2nd: Even overlooking this problem, however, a larger one exists. An Albuquerque public nuisance ordinance prohibits “[e]ntering upon any private property and looking into any occupied dwelling without the consent of the occupant or owner of the dwelling.” A reasonable
suspicion of criminal activity like this is enough to permit an officer to effect a brief investigative detention. REVERSED.


Comment #: 5535
I am a federal agent. Vazquez has been rated
locally as the worst District Judge. I personally have had a case in front of her and it was a disaster! Someone please explain to me how a Federal District Judge who has a brother that was put in prison for narcotics charges still sits on federal drug cases?