Hon. Robert C. Brack See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.N.M.  
Average Rating:No Rating - 1 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Robert C. Brack


Comments


Other

Comment #: 9226
Rating:1.0
Comments:
When a citizen appears before a federal judge, or any judge, they expect the law to be obeyed by the judge as required of the citizen. When the judge shows his prejudice toward the plaintiff and the subject matter, the judge should resign.
* * *

The original two-day Schools case trial became a shameful exhibit. The Pro Se Plaintiff's witness was denied. The Defense witnesses were shuffled about as was the exhibits previously agreed upon. Constant interruptions by Judge Brack to lecture the Plaintiff at length about how to ask questions, constant questions from the bench when the Plaintiff was questioning the witnesses, other conjured up distractions produced the desired effect of confusing the usually organized Plaintiff.

The scheduled two-day trial ended in the afternoon of the first day when Judge Brack said, "Mr. Weinbaum, you have 15-minutes to prepare you summation."