Hon. Anne C. Conway See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
M.D.Fla.  
Average Rating:3.1 - 13 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Anne C. Conway


Comments


Other

Comment #: 21487
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I cannot stand this judge. She was recently in the paper, crying that her budget to pay her employees is depleted -- yet she sent my friend back to prison for thirty days? You spent more money sending him back to jail, than any lesson that could be learned would have cost? Either shut your pie hole about your budget or smarten up. To send someone to federal prison for an additional thirty days costs a lot of money in processing, transportation, etc.

Litigant

Comment #: 21344
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I can't rate her because I want to believe that she was bamboozled by the defense counsel and that, in the end, she will do the right thing.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 19132
Rating:1.8
Comments:
Querulous and juvenile in presiding. Needs some basic skills training in ruling on objections and grasping evidentiary concepts.

Impartiality is a judge's most important qualification. She lacks that.

Ann Coulter's politics and a little of that same personality.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 13821
Rating:1.7
Comments:
Lack of neutrality is her defining feature. She is for the rich, against all others. She has a feeble grasp of the law. Does not work hard.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 13541
Rating:1.5
Comments:
She is just not neutral, so it does not matter what the law is. People can not plan their lives around their legal rights if a judge will not respect them. We don't have a queen, so no one person can overturn congress, the president, and all the court precedent, but that is how she operates.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12722
Rating:1.7
Comments:
A transactional background may explain a glaring weakness in understanding the rules of evidence and making correct rulings on objections. Takes a lot of shortcuts; does not seems to care much about doing a good job. Very shrill and ill-tempered and unpleasant.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12107
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Lacking in self-control, almost childlike, easily confused and disoriented, fragile emotionally. Strongly favors one side in a case.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12083
Rating:2.0
Comments:
Servant of wealth and power. No sense of neutrality or impartiality.

Unhappy person with weak trial skills and unpleasant demeanior and temperament.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 8688
Rating:8.6
Comments:
Handles massive caseload, but very sharp with the law. One of the best on the court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 5044
Rating:10.0
Comments:
One of our best judges. Has the courage to pull the trigger on legal issues.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2483
Rating:2.2
Comments:
Worse Federal Judge I have ever seen in my life. Obviously has personal agenda of being miserable and not even handed. Completely defense oriented to the point of where you wish she would recuse on every case she is on. Does not know the law either

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2471
Rating:1.3
Comments:
Seems decidedly anti-plaintiff in civil litigation.