Hon. D. Brock Hornby See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.Me.  
Average Rating:2.0 - 5 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. D. Brock Hornby


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 21641
Rating:2.0
Comments:
He is a truly haughty, arrogant and incompetent jurist. Not that he is unable to 'play ball' with the status quo, but he does not appreciate that the citizens created him and not the other way around, and that government and the courts are the servants of the public and that liberty trumps outweighs all other considerations. He is a narrow-minded prosaic drone, unable to follow complicated lines of reasoning, and does not show respect to those who employ him, but is chummy with his lawyerly ilk. He is a member of a true lawyer-priest elite.

Other

Comment #: 18325
Rating:9.0
Comments:
Most legal articles are written so heavily in "Lawyerese" as to be near indecipherable to a layman ("...not inconsistent...", etc. WHAT?!). Just finished Judge Hornby's "Summary Judgment Without Illusions" and want to thank him for writing it in understandable American English. A very refreshing change.

Litigant

Comment #: 7603
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Appears befuddled in his writings, which indicated that he did not know that he has the power to grant writs as per the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution. When challenged with the law, he dismissed the request for the writs. Also dismissed habeas corpus filings without a hearing, which is a violation of the law. Clearly has problems understanding his job and the law.

Litigant

Comment #: 7597
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Hornby needs to remove himself from the bench. He received plaintiff's claim and threatened her with sanctions if she continued to file her pleadings which were reasonable. A chief judge's duty is to see that justice is honored and the U.S. Supreme Court makes clear that a pro se's complaint must be heard and allowed to go forward. This judge is biased and prejudiced against the plaintiff and has allowed top officials, as defendants, to get away with their legally complained-of bad behavior when according to the law they are responsible and should be held accountable.

Other

Comment #: 4522
Rating:6.0
Comments:
Will "shut down" a person who poses potent questions which could expose the truth.