Hon. William E. Smith (Chief Judge) See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
D.R.I.  
Average Rating:9.2 - 4 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. William E. Smith (Chief Judge)


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 24732
Rating:7.8
Comments:
I give the judge high overall marks. My frustration is with his docket management. He does not drive cases forward to trial in an aggressive manner, and leaves discovery matters to his magistrate. That said, one of the better judges in the circuit

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21188
Rating:9.9
Comments:
Judge Smith is an ideal judge for any civil litigation matter. He is unfailingly polite and courteous to the attorneys and parties, and treats the greenest litigator in the same manner as he would a seasoned vet. He is prepared for every argument and generally probes both sides with thoughtful and often difficult questions. He is smart and well-credentialed, both in terms of education and prior law firm experience. His reasoning on decisions is sound and usually reflects research and analysis outside the content of the briefs. He knows and appropriately applies the Rules of Evidence at trial. In over a decade of practice before him, Judge Smith has ruled against me about as often as he has ruled for me, but I have never had a situation where I believed his ruling was sufficiently erroneous to take an appeal.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 11576
Rating:9.3
Comments:
Excellent demeanor

Smart

Practical

Labor law background (represented employers)