Hon. Joseph E. Irenas See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:7.7 - 11 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. Joseph E. Irenas


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 21010
I had a good experience with Judge Irenas. He is sharp, not afraid to speak his mind, and seems to have a knack for getting rid of unnecessary litigation.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 13512
Absolutely does not know anything regarding Special Education Code/Law to even apply it. Emotional, hostile, arrogant, biased.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 12957
I am an out-of-state lawyer who tried a lengthy, complicated jury trial in his court. He is a very active judge at trial, and does not hesitate to ask probing questions of any witness. His cross-examination of some of the witnesses was in many cases better than mine or opposing counsel's. He is smart and studies the law carefully. He treats the jury wonderfully and they love him for it. He keeps an unusual trial schedule, Monday thru Thursday, 8:30 a.m. to 2 p.m., with no breaks for lunch. I loved the trial schedule, as it made it possible to prepare each day without having to reach exhaustion. He will talk a lot with break during motion argument, but does not mind if you interrupt him if you have something to say, as he appears to love the back and forth. He has a strong "tell" during arguments, motions, and objections: Whenever he talks, he looks at the lawyer who is going to win the argument.


Comment #: 10626
I worked with Joseph Irenas he was the head of the department I worked in at McCarter & English in Newark NJ. He was an excellent attorney who was revered and feared by his underlings.

I am sure he has carried his standards along with him to the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 10024
I have found appearing before him is a challenge of the best kind. He is legitimately the brightest guy in the room.If an attorney offers something, especially in argument, he will not hesitate to verbally probe (or challenge) the limits of the logic proffered.And all should realize this: no matter how outwardly gruff he occasionally seems to be, the bottom line is that he is (in my experience) consistently fair, favoring (with rulings and sentences) neither Government nor defense.

Court Staff

Comment #: 9840
Judge Irenas is an extraordinarily fair judge, who always displays an extremely efficient knowledge of any case he handles.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 8798
Brilliant judge, well versed in knowledge of the law...make sure to laugh at his jokes!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 7629
His ego gets in the way of what could be a good judge. The end result is something way short of a good judge. Avoid him if you can. If you can't, be sure to approach with great care.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 7628
Rude, arrogant, and clearly biased. Not a good judge.