Hon. Nina Gershon See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
E.D.N.Y.  
Average Rating:7.4 - 22 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
   
Confirm E-mail Address      
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments



What others have said about Hon. Nina Gershon


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 18103
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Two recent experiences where Judge Gershon went out of her way to grant sentencing reductions in old cases. My impression was that the sentences had troubled her and she seized an opportunity in each case to do what she could. I found it impressive that she cared about these cases and these defendants -- so long after the fact and involving defendants who could have easily been forgotten.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 12678
Rating:9.2
Comments:
Great Judge

Other

Comment #: 9614
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Gershon elevated herself above those in the Federal Government charged with protecting the United States from fraud and criminal activities. Obviously, she is one of the liberal progressives who believes her idealism justifies protecting an organization (ACORN) rampant with fraud because it supports her political beliefs.

Other

Comment #: 9607
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Judge Nina, it is NOT unconstitutional to cut off the payment of billions of our tax dollars to a morally bankrupt organization like ACORN.

Other

Comment #: 9604
Rating:1.0
Comments:
so you decide what corrupt org get tax payer money. I do not want 1 cent going to acorn. Did they help you get elected?

Other

Comment #: 9601
Rating:1.0
Comments:
It is unconstitutional to be giving money to ACORN under any circumstances. She needs to read and study the Constitution along with the other liberals.

Other

Comment #: 9595
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Acorn has crossed the line as a non-profit, are currently being investigated for fraud and more, you and acorn are stealing my tax dollars, giving them thru fraud to many people who do not deserve the help, more redistribution of wealth thru intimidation, nice work judge nina. Do we as a government, need to put a morals clause in all contracts, it would apply, I'm sure to organizations like acorn. Don't throw the Constitution up to us when you aren't following it.

Other

Comment #: 9590
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Gershon;
In my opinion, you do NOT rate honorable, that is for people who do not subvert the Constitution as you have recently done, with your helping of the ACORN hoods. I noticed that Klinton appointed you, so that says a LOT, plus the fact of your Chicago connections. You need to resign, you are an insult to the honest citizens of this country!
Clay Dungey

Court Staff

Comment #: 9589
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
This Clinton appointee has repeatedly stated her bias in matters of this type. She was the "go-to" judge for this injuction, based on her history ruling against Mayor Giuliani on the MetArt case.

Other

Comment #: 9588
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Is she nuts?

Other

Comment #: 9586
Rating:10.0
Comments:
It is good to know that there are a few judges who read and understand the US constitution. Bills of attainer were widely practiced by the Crown and were among the principal causes of the revolution, The Founders saw fit to outlaw them twice in the Constitution.

Other

Comment #: 9584
Rating:1.0
Comments:
ACORN is a criminal enterprise and I'd like to know how the judge can rule it's unconstitutional to stop subsidizing these creeps. If Congress can hire them, they should be allowed to fire them. This judge is one of the reasons the U.S. is headed toward third world status.

Other

Comment #: 9583
Rating:1.0
Comments:
this is a left wing judge with an agenda! her ruling on acorn is an outrage!!!!!
there should be an appeal.
thanks bill clinton for your choice

Other

Comment #: 9582
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Are there no conservative judges left?

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 9579
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This moron has no clue what the definition and application of law concerning "bill of attainder" is. Has absolutely no business on the bench.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 9577
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Another oba-mao commie.

Other

Comment #: 9575
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Hon. Nina Gershon issued a preliminary injunction against the government and ruled that it is in the public's interest for ACORN to continue receiving federal funding. That's what I base my opinion on.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 1197
Rating:7.7
Comments:
very fair.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 1108
Rating:9.1
Comments:
Very smart, hard working and fair.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 1027
Rating:8.6
Comments:
A very fair judge, willing to grant habeas petitions even in the face of very restrictive rules