Hon. Mark L. Hornsby See Rating Details
Magistrate Judge See Comments
W.D.La.  
Average Rating:6.3 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation
Add a comment only

Ratings

*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Mark L. Hornsby


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: 35167
Rating:8.0
Comments:
I have a continuing trespass and conversion case because of Fiber Optic Cable placed in inappropriate areas of my yard during the MLK Holiday.

The Judge denied my motion to amend in bold red letters.

I feel his order harsh and insensitive towards my situation. He favored the defense attorneys, but as a Pro Se, it is what it is.

However, when he ordered the corporate defendant to get its cable apparatus out of my yard. (which i asked them to do before filing) he actually proved my trespass case for me, and probably saved a lot of time and heartache in doing so.

I give him an 8 for that

Litigant

Comment #: 13564
Rating:1.0
Comments:
In a Illegal Search and seizure by a private party (the hospital which I worked for) the police were present and he ruled that the hospital personel were not state agents