Hon. Leonard Davis See Rating Details
District Judge See Comments
Average Rating:6.4 - 8 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address      
Add a comment only


*Temperament:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Scholarship:   (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Industriousness:   (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:    (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
*Punctuality:    (1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:    (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation:   (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility In Scheduling   (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial:   (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:   (1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Trial:    (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:    (1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:    (1=10%,10=100%)
  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

What others have said about Hon. Leonard Davis


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 11901
Judge Davis is imminently fair, exceedingly patient and completely prepared in all that he does. One could not ask for any judge to have a better judicial temperament than Judge Davis. He gave both side a very fair trial.


Comment #: 5073
While the attorney involved may have made a technical error in relation to the labelling of discovery, Judge Davis apparently cannot count from 500 to 1,000. The defense in this particular case have filed six motions for summary judgment. All six motions were denied by Judge Davis.

06/28/07 – Unfortunately, Judge Davis has literally stamped his bench ruling with a final opinion. ...

P's are at this time preparing an appeal, wherein P's are rather certain to prevail. Ps firmly believe that the misrepresentations and omissions of D's will anger a new Jury against D's when a new trial is scheduled and hopefully in a different venue.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: 2944
In the one case I handled in front of Judge Davis, He entered a Summmary Judgment ruling based upon assumed facts which were directly contrary to those stipulated by both sides, and completely without support in the record. It was a diversity case, and he simply ignored controlling Texas authority, making up his own law of the case. When faced with a Motion to Alter or Amend, and presented with the fact that his judgment was completely unsupported by the record or the law, He briefly stated "you don't get another bite at the apple." In short, Judge Davis is a complete moron, utterly incompetent.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 2911
Has no qualifications to preside over a criminal case. No recognition or understanding of significant issues and no attempt to learn because there is complete disregard for the rights of the accused, who are presumed guilty.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: 2899
A neaderthal that would not recognize a civil right if it bit him on the butt