Hon. Douglas R. Cole (S.D.Ohio) This judge has the right stuff! Civil Litigation - Private - (5/27/2025 3:12:57 PM)

Hon. G. Murray Snow (D.Ariz.) Refuses to acknowledge Suprme Crt precedent cases rulings, constitution US and AZ, same for codes and laws. Bias benefitting "government" actor-agencies, Makes up law, bases rulings on fraudulent representations of defendants( gov) Rule 60 violations rule his court. Refuses equal treatment to pro-se plaintiffs, Ignores 14th amendment-due process procedures. ..and, he is a liar. i.e., he fabricates non existent events and non existent motion issues on which to base his rulings. Other - (5/23/2025 5:47:10 PM)

Hon. Andre Birotte, Jr. (C.D.Cal.) André Birotte Jr. cancelled a motion argument I had prepared diligently for and wrote what I feel was a bogus dismissal. Apparently, this is not uncommon for Mr. Birotte, as I have learned in the legal circles. It’s difficult to take the legal system seriously when we have folks like this in the judiciary. Folks call the court system a scam nowadays—and I think it’s because we have bad judges that support corruption and bogus caselaw (so long as it supports corrupt institutional powers). As someone pointed out, I expected better from a judge that was appointed by a Democrat (Obama). Highly disappointed to say the least! Makes me question my profession and the caliber of judges we have running the show. Civil Litigation - Private - (5/23/2025 5:16:44 PM)

Hon. Michael P. Shea (D.Conn.) He is violating 1st amendment rights and hiding public info so guilty police officers can avoid "embarrassment " for their disgraceful actions towards the public. Sad that the court is not supposed transparency in our government! Criminal Defense Lawyer - (5/21/2025 1:24:18 PM)

Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall (C.D.Cal.) How does a case filed within the Eastern Riverside Division land up in the Western Los Angeles Division by "MISTAKE" is >UNKNOWN< Litigant - (5/14/2025 3:15:48 PM)

Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall (C.D.Cal.) Honorable District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall needs to recuse herself [Redacted by Ed.]. Sean Simon Roseman, the Plaintiff, is a Pro Se litigant, a Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) and immigrant from a foreign country, a minority of Jewish descent, a former victim of violent crime according to CalVCB, and a victim of Intersectional Discrimination, intimidation, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination of employment after hire, and Antisemitism in this race related employment discrimination complaint. Honorable District Judge Consuelo B Marshall refuses to correct the venue of my case to the Eastern Division in Riverside where: ~ I correctly filed and designated the venue in the Eastern Division ~ The discrimination occured in the Eastern Division ~ Where I live in the Eastern Division ~ All the witnesses and Managers who discriminated against me live in the Eastern Division After almost three months of wasted time denying two motions for change of venue, this judge continues to hold onto a case that shouldn't be in the Western Division. She has filed denials that conflict law, violate her oath as a judge, and violate the rules of professional conduct. How my Eastern Division case actually landed up in the Western Division is unknown. Now as a pro Se litigant and victim I have to file a Writ of Mandamus, submit complaints to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and file a notarized Affidavit Motion to Recuse. She is biased against me as well as has an interest in her portfolio of Walmart stock, the same defendant in my case against Walmart. This judge should step down from her post. No judge is above the law they are required to keep according to their oaths provided in judgeship. Here is a prime example of the moral turpitude sweeping across this country tearing it apart at the seams. A moral turpitude considered inherently depraved, immoral, or shocking to the public conscience. The same depravity used in witness impeachment that violate social norms, duties owed to others, and generally accepted standards of behavior. Honorable District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall should be ashamed of herself and her actions taken against an innocent party and victim in this case. A Plaintiff as victim in this district court or any other court within this country, is not required to have to file several Motions to Recuse, several Motions for Change of Venue, submit several complaints to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for Misconduct and Disability, and Writ of Mandamus so that a Plaintiff may fairly adjudicate a matter brought by such an action. This is a serious miscarriage of justice and adds insult to injury while trying to find remedy. These types of biased actions brought against an innocent party as victim in a civil action while trying to find relief are discriminatory, egregious, and illegal. Such misconduct provided by any judge is met with equal discipline as is required by precedent to prevent others similarly situated from continuing such a disgusting trend of unlawful behavior. Litigant - (5/14/2025 2:27:44 PM)

Hon. Thomas P. Smith (D.Conn.) Hon. Thomas P. Smith denial of protect Title II and Public Entities: Title II of the ADA applies to state and local governments, requiring them to provide equal access to services, programs, and activities for people with disabilities, according to ADA.gov. This means public entities have a specific legal obligation to ensure accessibility and non-discrimination, and the burden is on them to prove they are meeting these obligations see tenn v. lane Litigant - (5/13/2025 10:26:19 AM)

Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger (S.D.N.Y.) Not learned on the law, biased and does not uphold his own rulings. Not a good combination for the bench. Civil Litigation - Private - (5/11/2025 12:24:06 AM)

Hon. Hernán D. Vera (C.D.Cal.) I feel sorry for him. He must be extremely miserable to be so mean. He ignores facts and law, instead choosing to rely on egotistical intuition. Civil Litigation - Private - (5/10/2025 12:27:59 AM)

Hon. Roger T. Benitez (S.D.Cal.) When the same person leaves 5 or 6 10 star comments within minutes of each other, it lessens the value of this website, and makes me wonder, did you Judge Benitez write these comments about yourself or was it a family member? Criminal Defense Lawyer - (5/6/2025 10:42:15 AM)