"The Robing Room: AK State Judges

Hon. Catherine M. Easter	See Rating Details
Judge Superior
Anchorage County Third Judicial District	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.8 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 4 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Catherine M. Easter

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AK103
Rating:1.6

Comments:
Judge Catherine Easter is extremely unprofessional and completely bias towards men's and thier rights as parents. She allows the female parties unrestricted time to present their case while the men are rushed and oftentimes silenced. She does not respect or recognizes the Publix constitutional rights as well as follow Alaska state law. I feel in demand that Catherine Easter the disbarred from her position as a superior court judge and arrested for crimes against humanity. Not only for the allegations stated above but also for the tyrannical and manipulative way she uses her authority to take good Fathers who are often times more financially mentally spiritually scholastically then the mother's in her case loads. Often times judge Easter will take professional recommendations from the mothers in a custody battle without any tangible proof of allegations made. Often ordering the male parties to extreme measures in order to just have a couple of hours with their children. If you have judge Easter pray you are not a male
View Detail Send e-mail to this poster 6/23/2022 11

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AK72
Rating:2.1

Comments:
Judge Easter is biased to the State who signs her paychecks, and the private interest groups who vote for her. DO NOT wind up in her court! If you have the option to BUMP her, do it! You couldn't get any worse!

Litigant

Comment #: AK71
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Easter had a State's witness draw a map which favored the litigant. Then, the State's attorney called for a break. After the break, the State's attorney asked Easter if his witness could redraw his map! That was after he was obviously coached on the break, and she let him!! Unbelievable bias towards the State! She is unable to view evidence without blatant bias! Vote her OUT!

Litigant

Comment #: AK38
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Prejudged a case 2 days before trial. They said they were bias on the audio. Superficial decision, ignored other side outright. Policed hearing. Hijacked direction of proceedings. Not willing to explore alternative theories. Rushed and/or cut off the party she clearly did not like.

Litigant

Comment #: AK30
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Poor. Prejudged a case I watched. Appeared bias to one attorney from the outset of the first day. Poorly reasoned decision.

Litigant

Comment #: AK10
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Catherine Easter is discriminatory, biased, and does not follow Alaskan law. She has been known to steer proceedings, and does not read through the entire case prior to making a ruling.