"The Robing Room: AK State Judges

Hon. Andrew Guidi	See Rating Details
Judge Superior
Anchorage County Third Judicial District	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.3 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Andrew Guidi

Comments

Court Staff

Comment #: AK97
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Very disturbing behavior. Does not adhere to law, manipulates cases, openly biased, makes derogatory comments to litigants and disparaging insults on and off record. Does not know anything about the cases in his load and is not organized. Has private conversations with opposing counsel to include assisting with how to proceed with the case encouraging criminal behavior.

Other

Comment #: AK95
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
[Redacted by Ed.] Victims advocates, court therapists, etc ALWAYS says he’s a pro father judge no matter if there is clear & convincing evidence of abuse. He is ALWAYS for the criminal no matter how much evidence is provided, he discounts it, gets VERY ANGRY at a victim & wants to know who was “told” of a rape crime. Guidi will ask things like “when did the rape happen?” Victim replied 2007- He slammed his fist down and said “THATS ANCIENT HISTORY!” Guidi is a VERY dangerous person to be in the position he is in, and is a direct reflection of the Anchorage Judicial system. Does not follow any color of law, assists opposing counsel writing orders, does not follow ARCP, keeps files in chambers & if copies are needed the file comes down a disaster with missing pleadings & evidence - understanding that each time he touches the file he can charge the state. AJC’s recent unanimous retention is very concerning as Guidi had the most complaints [Redacted by Ed.]

Other

Comment #: AK93
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Terrible, he does not care about what is right for the child. He always favors the father even if he's a drunk abusive man, he gives the fathers chance after chance to keep messing his kids up and is unwilling to give a mother the same opportunity. Not only that even with evidence proving the father is unfit and child has spoken up to the abuse he still lets the father have custody. Its an abomination that he is still allowed to be a judge and should be let go.

He is know for his favoritism of fathers hes known as "the fathers rights judge" instead of being there to do what's right for the child.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AK58
Rating:1.3

Comments:
Unprofessional. Abundance of Ex-Parte Communications with opposing counsel. Calls client (Plaintiff) names at the last 3 hearings. Does not adhere to law and justice. Does not adhere to ethics and impartially. Disparagingly known as “the fathers rights judge”.