Hon. Vanessa H. White See Rating Details
Judge
Superior
Palmer County
Third Judicial District
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Vanessa H. White


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AK70
Rating:1.1
Comments:
Demonstrable Anti-father extremist.

Other

Comment #: AK69
Rating:1.0
Comments:
US Constitution has no place in my court room...

Other

Comment #: AK61
Rating:2.0
Comments:
White awarded primary custody to the mother even though she acknowledged there had been a history of physical abuse towards the children. The father had no history of abuse towards the children and the children even requested that they live with the father.
She displayed other forms of favoritism towards the mother in property division.

Other

Comment #: AK60
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Notoriously a mother-friendly judge who has ruined countless families with her Family Law decisions. She will use current statutes against fathers at every turn... which exposes her bias.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AK56
Rating:1.3
Comments:
They put an ardent feminist in the courts to decide custody and divorce cases. It should surprise no one when a bias against men appears in her courtroom.