"The Robing Room: AK State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Thomas I Temple

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: AK88
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Excellent judge. Throughout the multi day hearing, I had faith that the judge would see through my ex's lies. He never let on what he would do. He was always courteous. I was nervous because the stakes were high, but I kept the faith while my ex and his lawyer attacked me. In the end he ruled in my favor, seeing through the BS. My ex told me I would never see my son again, but now I have primary custody. I'm so relieved that the truth came out.

Other

Comment #: AK82
Rating:1.0

Comments:
He was verbally abusive to me in court, allowed my ex and his lawyer to verbally abuse me. Took the side of my ex and accused me of inappropriate behavior when there was ZERO proof (because it never happened) to back up he or my ex. He threatened me with the loss of my son and jail time for "interfering with custody" because my 16-year-old son was refusing to go to his dad's house -- because his dad ignores him, won't interact with him, won't talk to him, etc. Told me that if my 16-year-old son refused to go to his dad's house that I was to LOCK HIM OUT OF MY HOUSE, or go to jail. This judge has NO place overseeing divorces.