"The Robing Room: AZ State Judges

Hon. James E. Marner	See Rating Details
Superior Court Judge Superior Court
Pima County	See Comments
Tucson
Attorney Average Rating: 1.7 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 5.0 - 2 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. James E. Marner

Comments

Other

Comment #: AZ2607
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Complete misogynist and unfamiliar with family law. Very anti-mother. Listens to hearsay. Asked the plaintiff's attorney (who represented ex-husband) for his advice on family law and issued a ruling before he allowed me to speak. Unless you can afford to be represented by an attorney, try to avoid this judge.

Other

Comment #: AZ1788
Rating:10.0

Comments:
I had the honor of seeing this judge in action over the course of a year as I attended the court process of a family member. I had pretty much lost faith in public servants until now, but was very impressed with the extreme seriousness and sincerity with which he took his job, unfailingly time and again. To me, looking at each one of these cases with fresh eyes seems like an impossible task. But he presided fairly again and again. He is obviously a good man who cares about people and the integrity of the court.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1503
Rating:2.4

Comments:
Worst family law judge I've ever presented in front of. Despite clear evidence, he still views a situation totally incorrectly. He listens to one parties hearsay and takes it into account when it is a very obvious lie. Does not follow state recommendations for parenting plans. Puts parental rights above a child's right. Seems anti-mother. Has a strong biased nature toward military service.