Hon. Kenneth Lee See Rating Details
Presiding Judge
Superior Court
Pima County
See Comments
Tucson

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Kenneth Lee


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ2684
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Disgrace to the profession. He is assigned to private to protect people yet allows attorneys to reduce an estate to virtually nothing and approves outrageous and abusive fees. He’s also dumb as dirt and takes sides them becomes abusive. He appointed a someone as conservator/guardian who in a matter of months had abuse claims and breach of fiduciary duty claims. This moron also doesn’t care about the truth. Accepts lies and fabricated evidence. Then bullies and threatens litigants to get what he wants. He should be removed from the bench and disbarred as an attorney to protect the public from the moron.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ2107
Rating:4.8
Comments:
He is not a fair judge. He picks a side he likes at the beginning and then lets that side have all the advantages and doesn't let the other side have any leeway. Definitely prejudges the case before he hears any evidence.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: AZ1919
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Guy is stupid! Thinks he is smarter than either lawyer. I think the guy is bigoted against white people.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: AZ1871
Rating:2.1
Comments:
I believe he views things through his racial prism.