"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Cindy Dobler Davis	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
San Diego County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 10.0 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Cindy Dobler Davis

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA53091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
From the information gathered from different official web sites, This judge has been assigned to address the mentally ill criminals in society, yet she is your prototypical clueless irrational illogical feminist who is either unwilling or unable to identify female cluster B personality disorder Narcissists and sociopaths.

Cluster B personality disorder is the single most damaging psychiatric condition in society. They are 1.2% of the population and are responsible for 39% of all crimes in society. Now here is the profoundly ridiculous dilemma:

How in the heck are you supposed to address and fix a problem when you don’t have the intellect, qualification, historical case record or professional history of having been able to accurately identify criminals.

Cluster B’s are con artists. If Davis can not identify the criminal, which she easily gets conned into not being able to, do you know who she rules against? THATS CORRECT, the VICTIM!!!

She is truly an empty headed unintelligent judge with zero talent in being in charge of addressing criminals with mental health problems. Her track record proves it.

In any descent universe (with California being a degenerating state), this woman would have NEVER been assigned to the bench. She is qualified to nod and smile and sell you coffee at Starbucks with an accent of a valley girl . That’s about it.

Yet another judge appointed to the bench based purely on politics rather than talent and merit. But then again, this is the state that gave usKamala Harris as VP, and she is the laughing stock of not only America, but the entire world.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA31297
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
does not have strong logical or analytical skills, she is not through and misses critical facts, not smart at all, empty head that just nods and smiles

Other

Comment #: CA29138
Rating:1.0

Comments:
pro-female, disregards the law to rule in favor of the female

shrewd lawyers can easily manipulate her, she is dull and unintelligent

yet another worthless judge appointed politically,

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA16088
Rating:10.0

Comments:
Not afraid to decide tough issues. When she was still a commissioner, she accurately granted a motion that changed the way their clerk's office handles defaults. She "only" had to correctly apply well-briefed existing law, but there are judges in the state who have not wanted to upset the apple cart. And of course there are always the commissioners (Riverside and Placer counties come to mind) who actually state that they will not make a decision contrary to how a judge would rule, no matter what the BINDING law is.