"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Perry Parker	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Sutter County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.9 - 8 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 12 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Perry Parker

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA53429
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Perry Parker denied severely mentally ill victims of rape restraining orders,then he evicted them out of their permanently supportive housing and place them on the streets with The predator, he also denied elderly tenants a reasonable accommodations for grab bars and evicted them as well from the same permanent supportive housing program and covered up the murder of Lisa Acosta by the same predator who admitted to all crimes. Judge Perry Parker is a scumbag and should be ( something )for what he has done to the victims of rape and murder in our county. Has he stated the fact that he did not care about the disability and did not have time to hear anybody, even though there were 450 calls for police services at one address for rape elder abuse murder threats this judge should have never been a judge.

Other

Comment #: CA49401
Rating:1.0

Comments:
He knew the plaintiff personally and wouldn’t even hear the other side of the case! He had his mind made up even before the hearing got started. Horrible attitude. Not professional at all!

Other

Comment #: CA48854
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Absolutely unprofessional! My spouse cleaned out our joint checking account and left me with nothing during a DV case. This fool made the comment in court proceedings "I would have done the same"! It is not appropriate for a judge to interject their personal opinions on what they would do in any case! The soon to be ex spouse believes he was "right" in doing this because of this fools comments! Many other instances where he is just not engaged to do his job in an ethical way.

Litigant

Comment #: CA42080
Rating:3.0

Comments:
He decided the case before it even began.

Litigant

Comment #: CA38550
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This man allowed for my husband's entire business to be stolen from him illegally through Secretary of State fraudulent filings. He refused to read a single piece of paper or review evidence of the crime in over 10 hearings. Allowed Defendant to purger themself over and over on the stand when proof of the perjury was presented in real-time. Ruled on their behalf "because their paperwork was easier to read" WHAT? Every time we were in court I was appalled by his demeanor and nastiness towards everyone in the courtroom. Literally stating "I don't like to read" So don't bother giving this so-called judge evidence, he is just watching the clock for his t time at the golf course. He has no interest in getting to the bottom of cases and no interest in serving justice. He should be removed from the bench. Make sure you sign the petition. The man is destroying lives and going golfing every day and it needs to be put to a stop!

Other

Comment #: CA19997
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
He should not even have the right to be called a judge he’s one sided. He made eye contact with the lawyer the whole time he was speaking. When I spoke he did not make eye contact with me he was lookin at his laptop the whole time. When u wanted to present me evidence he said I did not need to he had his mind made up. But didn’t give me a chance to present evidence this guy is a scum of the earth and a dirtbag.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA18436
Rating:2.3

Comments:
Saying the worst judge ever would be an understatement. She made an ex parte custody decision without even holding a hearing, or seeing the litigants. She simply had a phone call with another judge then sent out a custody order. Should be removed.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA14009
Rating:1.4

Comments:
He prejudged this case long before he heard it. The matter is now up on appeal.

Other

Comment #: CA11949
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge perry parker discriminates and does not follow the law rather renders judgement based on feelings.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11945
Rating:2.0

Comments:
Perry Parker does not discriminate by party/side so much as he does by gender, ethnicity, culture, nation of origin and perceived social class. He's generally awful to everyone, but particularly demeaning and abusive to women, immigrants (legal status notwithstanding) and anyone who does not speak fluent and unaccented American English.

Other

Comment #: CA11832
Rating:1.0

Comments:
this is the worst judge ever.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11496
Rating:1.9

Comments:
Perry is a judge who should have not been in our case as he knew our plaintiff from many prior cases in his field as a highway patrol. He treated so badly and the plaintiff like gold.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA10888
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Horrific. Won't remove self on Preemporty challenge, despite obvious grounds. Takes sides and bribes.

Other

Comment #: CA10634
Rating:1.0

Comments:
My "hearing" was heard and in dismissed in the matter of 35 seconds. Hardly an unbiased judge whom delivers judgement without any sense of hearing.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA8740
Rating:2.4

Comments:
Terrible attitude and blatantly states that he would rather be golfing (or drinking according to his arrest record).

Other

Comment #: CA6343
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Horrible.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA6175
Rating:1.0

Comments:
We recently had a motion hearing. He did not respond with an opinion until 10 weeks later, which means he did not remember what the attorneys said at the motion. His ruling was one-sided, did not consider the elements of the case, applicable State Law or Case Law. He simply quoted out of the papers from the one side.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA5296
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I'm a plaintiff's attorney. After a year of waiting, I finally got a CMC. I asked Judge Parker for a trial date ASAP, but the defense counsel asked for a new CMC, in three months, on the ground that he had not conducted any discovery. Judge Parker reamed out the defense counsel for awhile, and then abruptly set a new CMC for 22 months in the future. Not a trial date, a CMC: 22 months. I couldn't believe my ears, so I immediately (and politely) asked Judge Parker to repeat the date, and he angrily replied, "I can't remember."

To make matters worse, when we get the new CMC, the trial date will almost certainly have to be scheduled after the three-year discretionary dismissal period. While I was sitting and watching the call of the calendar, another case was near the three-year period. The defense counsel said he was not going to file a motion to dismiss for delay in prosecution, but the Judge badgered him, telling him that he really should. That's right: He told the defense counsel what dispositive motion to make, and he strongly, strongly implied he would grant the motion when it was presented.

It makes me wonder whether that is Judge Parker's plan for my lawsuit. And I don't have the slightest inkling what he has against me or my client.

Litigant

Comment #: CA2768
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Arrogant, makes threats. Thug with power.

Other

Comment #: CA2541
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge does not know the law or follow it. Rules on what he "believes." I thought it was a court room, not a church. Disgraceful.

Other

Comment #: CA2535
Rating:4.0

Comments:
Sat as a courtroom observer for a special project and saw Judge Parker flex his prejudice against Punjabi litigants more than once. Considering the demographic of his district, this is a bit concerning. Pretty obviously biased and intolerant. His hubris and "ivory tower" attitude was far from objective. A sad case of a man who is in need of retirement. Easily flustered and put off by everyone including his court staff.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA2517
Rating:3.4

Comments:
Vindictive person. If you disagree with him you will never see even justice from him