Hon. Akemi D. Arakaki See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Akemi D. Arakaki


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA34062
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Hearing today March 8, 2021 with this Judge Akemi Arakaki. I was told todays court was to determine INDIAN LINEAGE. Which has been requested for over 3yrs. The child in question. (AMARYAN SCOTT 03/05/04) TO DATE They have not contacted anyone in my family. My mothers mom is (AMARYAN SCOTTS) Great granma full CHEROKEE also on her moms side is BLACK FOOT. Also my child AMARYAN has been MISSING for over YEAR. During this court hearing they INTENTIONALLY HAD ME ON MUTE. How can they make motions on a child left in there PROTECTIVE CARE and havent spoken to the child in over a year. The last report they sent me, they put false information on stating FOSTER PARENT WAS JASON SCOTT my son.It is obvious the Social Worker is not doing there job. AMARYAN was removed from there home back in 2017 when his wife got sick.she has been in several group homes since 2017. When she was dropped off at the DCFS office in Pomona The opposing lawyer LIED UNDER OATH TODAY..WHEN SHE STATED THE CHILD IS STILL REFUSING TO COME HOME TO HER MOTHER. SHE HAVENT SEEN OR SPOKEN TO AMARYAN IN OVER A YEAR. They have called me on asking have I SEEN OR HEARD FROM HER.

[Redacted]