"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Elizabeth G. Macias	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Orange County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Elizabeth G. Macias

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA54638
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
54633:- "The two repetitive delusional paranoid ravers" and yet delusion poster 54633-took the time to comment on it -and such details 'are still at it, **four years later.." very interesting.. Four Years????? But, who is keeping track???? Sounds like psycho LA family court nepo. attorney troll-who also writes offensive posts on this judge and others-to deflect from posts on troll's judge connection---troll also threatens litigants who posted ironically about these very abuses.

Other

Comment #: CA54634
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
54633--Post-EXACT "same, repetitive delusional paranoid" offensive wording, as LASC nepotism nasty family court attorney troll, who is watching and obsessed with site waaay toooo-** much; too deflect from posts on nepo. attorney -troll's nepo family court judge connection-and troll is obsessed with this judge and an attorney- troll who bugged the sh*t out of the moderators of this site to delete truthful posts on the troll's judge connections and even demanded removal of certain judges' names-and NO one mentioned the "moderators" in recent posts --other than this family court nepo. attorney troll and their guilty conscience-and brought this up , out of nowhere-and posted during the late hours. trying to also curry favor with the moderators, much, because guilty LA family court nepo. attorney troll bugged them sooo much???

Other

Comment #: CA54633
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The two repetitive delusional paranoid ravers are still at it, four years later, and each of them thinks the other, and the moderators for this site, are part of the vast conspiracy.

Other

Comment #: CA31674
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Back to the battle of the two repetitive delusional paranoid ravers, and each of them thinks the other, and the moderators for this site, are part of the vast conspiracy. Wow.