"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Pamela M. Parker

Comments

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA49227
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA48734
Rating:1.0

Comments:
respond to CA48733

It's actually the other way around. She does not hold female abusers accountable and further hurts the male victims, hence the reference to Amber Heard. She is unable to detect the female narcissist/sociopath. What you are saying proves that you are bias, you are referring to female victims. Are you even considering that there are male victims of malignant females? It is general knowledge that females are not held accountable for their misdeeds in western society and specifically in family court. However, Judge Parker has taken it to the most ridiculous levels, she does not hold malignant females for anything AT ALL. Hence she has become famous for not only protecting females psychopaths, she actually promotoes and encourages their evil behavior. To protect her false deranged pseudo-feminist ideology, this judge unleashes her full wrath on the innocent male victim. Such irrational and illogical behavior is becoming the norm of the radical left. You can clearly see it in the past 10 years. It's also becoming prevalent in society as a ploy for the abusers to gaining attention and material success by screaming and yelling "I'm a victim, I'm a victim, I'm a victim" while at the whole time they are the covert abuser. Take a look at Amber Heard and Angelina Jolie and Mel Gibsons gold digging ex-wife Oksana Grigorieva. When males in relationship draw boundaries to stop the female abuse and their exploitations, most females who decide to leave the marriage consult the lawyers BEFORE the divorce who tell them "Here is how you can get win in court, hit him with something, throw something at him, slap him, punch him, and record his reaction towards you, MAKE SURE YOU ARE CAREFUL NOT TO RECORD the incident where you punch him hit him, throw stuff at him, ONLY record his reaction to the trauma that he is suffering to make him look crazy so you can be awarded tons of money". This is what Judge Parker does not understand. A female who does this is a covert narcissistic sociopath and should not be awarded alimony and custody. This type of person will finally get caught because this is a personality pattern and will come up again and again. Look at Amber Heards life and Angelina Jolies life. They have done this multiple times to mulitple people. But society does not hold them accountable for all the damage they do. Even that psychopathic lady from Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes, actually thought and actually said "they dont put pretty girls like me in jail". This is how delusional these Cluster B psychopaths are. Elizabeth Holmes, being a total psychopath, actually was delusional enough to think that there are NEVER any repercussions for females. If she was in Judge Parker's court, her delusions would be accurate. Judge Parker would not hold her accountable for anything because of her ideology and her lack of intellect to detect a malignant female psychopath. You want proof? Look at the Diana Lovejoy case that Parker was presiding over. The only way this type of behavior from females stops is for laws to get passed that will bring severe penalty against females with jail-time and expensive fines for ruining a man's life. Also judges who consistently rule on behalf of these females must be identifies and REMOVED from the bench with full exposure. I hope and pray judge parker is the first judge that will snowball the removal of some of these maliganant man-hating judges.

Other

Comment #: CA48733
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
48729-Because some very bad CA judges on this TRR site (some family judges from SD to LASC), demand that their name and posts be removed, so that negative posts and the truth does not exist on this site; while this judge is not afraid to protect female victims of abuse and hold sexist, abusive, male perps. like some of these posters, accountable.

Other

Comment #: CA48729
Rating:1.0

Comments:
It seems like this judge has the most reviews out of any judge in California. There is no other judge on this site with near 300 reviews with 97% being negative.
Most of these reviews are repetitive in it's content and message. They can all be summarized in one simple sentence:

"A staunch feminist judge that has zero ability to identify a female sociopath litigant is a menace to the foundation of society"

Other

Comment #: CA48725
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA48175
Rating:1.0

Comment #: CA47690
Rating:1.0

Comments:
`She lacks common sense. In combination to being blindly pro-female and profound inability to discern and identify toxic personalities, makes her extremely dangerous and damaging judicial officer. But on the other hand, I believe california deserves a judge like this on the bench because of the woke culture they have adopted.

Other

Comment #: CA47501
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge lives in her own idealistic pseudo-feminist mind. She chooses not to engage with reality and facts. The men in her courtroom have zero chance at getting justice. Your only hope is to recuse her using CCP 170.6 ten days before your first hearing. If you are a male and your lawyer does not move to recuse her before the hearing, fire your lawyer immediately because that lawyer does not have your best interest and your children's best interest in mind.

Other

Comment #: CA47381
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She hates fathers and concept of fatherhood. She cant even hide it very well. It's shameful

Other

Comment #: CA46774
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Just Another brainwashed stomach churning hypocrite judge "pretend" feminist. Does not hold females accountable for their crimes. This raging pseudo-feminist is the embodiment of evil family court and disintegration of family structure in america.

The primary function of "modern" feminism is to shield women from accountability. Most "fem!nists" like her today don't have a clue what they are fighting for—default response: "women's rights!" or "equal pay!" —but they damned sure will fight for privileges without accountability. What they are really fighting for is femalism, not feminism per say itself and the protections from accountability/reality it provides, not for equality or any other such stated purpose.

She is just a giant hypocrite. And nothing god hates more than a hypocrite. And when exposed, EVERYONE, including god, hates a hypocrite.

I see a bitter and painful end to her career and later years of her life. She deserves every bit of it for being consciously evil and trying to hide it. Too bad for her, she has now gotten completely exposed.

Other

Comment #: CA46647
Rating:1.0

Comment #: CA45182
Rating:1.0

Comments:
...

The only value I see in this gender bias and misandrist judge is if she is only allowed to preside over divorce cases where 2 lesbians are divorcing. As her record has shown, when a heterosexual couple of divorcing, the men are demolished 99 percent of the time and the children are demolished 99.9% of the time. And if she happens to preside over a case where a 2 gay male couples are divorcing, you can bet that both men will be demolished 100.0% of the time.

This brainwashed pseudo-feminist judge is everything that is wrong with family court. She has very low intelligence and suffers from chronic anger and misery. It is well documented on sociological studies that the level of genuine personal morals are correlated with peace and happy. Take a look at her angry and miserable face every morning. What does that tell you? Someone with this kind of of anger and miserable existence is not only toxic at work, but is also toxic in their own personal life.

I hope I live long enough to see this atrocious judge either voluntary or involuntary be removed in disgraced from the bench so she can spend the rest of her angry miserable life contemplating the awful duplicitous and hypocritical life she has led. She isn't fooling anyone except her own unintelligent miserable self.

Other

Comment #: CA45144
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA42582
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge's hardwired ideological make-up prevents her from judging family court cases objectively. In addition, the glaring glee and snickering in her man-hating rulings present a disturbing picture of her actually enjoying and getting a psychological reward of hurting men. It is quite disturbing on par with psychopathic characteristics seen in criminal behavior. Her involvement in radical pro-female left wing organizations around San Diego further cement her hardwired ideology. [redacted by Ed.] What you are left with is families destroyed, specially children and also females that are not help accountable for perjury, crime and misdeeds in the court. [redacted] Judge Pamela Parker is one of the worst judges in California, propped up and promoted [redacted]. She is not going to be removed from the bench unless she quits her job voluntarily. But by exposing her and her behavior and rulings, the people subjected to her abuse and awful rulings can make her professional and personal life extremely unpleasant and unsatisfactory. Please continue posting regarding this judge and completely expose her so she will be put under the microscope.

Other

Comment #: CA42534
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA40650
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
"believe all women".....isn't that Judge Parker's motto?

when will someone remove this man-hater off the bench?

Other

Comment #: CA40558
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
this comment is directed towards 40549 and 40549

It's very odd how you have no legal connection to Pamela Parker and you keep coming on this forum and accusing other posters of misogyny and abuse. You don't know anything about these other posters. You continue to refer to some unrelated Los Angeles judge and continue stating incessantly that you are a vicim. To the untrained eye and someone who doesn't realize what you are all about, it seems like you are just an angry feminist. But someone who has training in psychology and psychiatry can see beyond just your words. I'm going to clear this up on this forum so everyone will understand what you are doing. I believe you are attention seeking where you are not supposed to be seeking attention, which is very odd. You don't even belong on this forum. The techniques you are using in your posts are cliche and quite similar to personalities of your type. The list is very long, but I'll only give you a list of 10 things you are doing, ready?

1) Projection
2) Deflection
3) Attempts at artificially creating chaos
4) Lack of shame or guilt in false accusations
5) creating doubts by false statements
6) outright lying
7) Low impulse control in your posts
8) seeking attention at all cost, narcissistic
9) manipulating emotions of people reading this post
10) not believing that the rules of the forum apply to you

You are completely disingenuous. Since you have never been in front of judge parker, then you really don't belong here, yet you continue to propagate your top 10 on every other comment. This leads me to believe that you have some sort of a skin in this game.

You are either Judge Parker herself or someone who has some sort of an incentive to derail the focus off judge Parker. I'm going to go out of a limb and say you might even be a hired troll by someone who does not want Judge Parker exposed.

Unfortunately for you, you are not succeeding. I for one know how to deal with impulsive individuals and individuals that will seek reward despite all risks. In fact, your presence here is doing the exact opposite of helping judge parker. You are hurting her. What you dont realize is that the people on this board are using your innate impulsivity and inherent aggression tone to further expose the incompetence and the bias man hating attitude of judge parker.

So keep writing, we love having you here.

Other

Comment #: CA40544
Rating:1.0

Comments:
I love seeing false accusers being held accountable at last. AH doesn't have the money to put up the bond and lawyer fees for the appeal. This is all posturing for attention just like a typical narcissist. No matter how many muffins she sells, she will not have enough money for the 10.35 million bond and lawyer fees. Her announcement in appealing the case is disingenuous. It's time true abuse victims started holding the people who accuse them accountable. The judges and prosecutors need to pay attention as well. If they continue to following the political agenda rather than a the law, they will be removed from the bench and disbarred. Whoever 40492 is, you are out of touch with reality. The tide has turned against "believe all women". It's time to "believe actual victims". How would you like it if people started saying "believe all men'?. I don't think you would like it. But then again, you don't like anything since you are miserable and likely either related to Judge Parker or judge parker herself.

Other

Comment #: CA40493
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I second that motion. However, I'll buy Judge Parker "muffins" for the rest of her life if she voluntarily retires.

Other

Comment #: CA40492
Rating:1.0

Comments:
to the raging commentator who keeps spewing nonsense regarding LASC family attorney, I believe that you are a domestic violence survivor, I feel your pain and I hope you can get help to remedy your PTSD. But again, this forum is to comment on Judge Parker and not some LASC lawyer or judge. Aside from that, I promised myself that I will buy "muffins" for everyone in the household for a month if JD wins. That's now 90 muffins that I had to buy from Costco. I am wiling to send you and man-hating judge Parker muffins for a month if you give me your address.

Other

Comment #: CA40455
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This message is to all the male divorcing parties who are scheduled to appear in front of Judge Pamela Parker. If you are a male, you must move to recuse her using CCP 170.6 to disqualify judge parker. You must do it 10 days prior to appearing in front of her before your first hearing. To all the males, you have zero change of getting justice in front of Judge Parker. If the men do not disqualify her, they will lose. You can ask about her reputation from any other person who has been in her court. They will corroborate the issue at hand. Recuse her and avoid the disaster that will surely occur in your life if she remains the judge in your case.

Other

Comment #: CA40422
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
In 2016/2017, my ex-wife accused me of beating her without any evidence, it was basically my word against her word. And judge Parker believed her. From 2018 onward, my ex-wife has stated 3 times on court record that I never beat her, and that I only pushed her. During the height of the #metoo movement, men were getting destroyed on just simple accusations. I lost everything I had just because of an accusation. I was a business owner from 2013 to 2017. I had 8 female employees and one male employee. I make business decisions based on risks vs rewards, assets vs liabilities. During my divorce case and during that particular climate, since I was concerned about the risk of false accusations, despite zero complaints and zero animosity from my female employees, I fired every single one of them to avert the risk and closed down the business. My male employee had quit and moved away to the east coast. So I only had female employees at that time. All my female employees either liked me or were neutral. I did not have any female employees that disliked me. But As a result of what Judge Parker did to me and as a result of a the left wing "cancel" mob and that particular #metoo climate, I made a calculated business decision and I fired every single one of them. Amongst the 8 female employees, as a result of me firing them and closing down the business, the financial stress let to 3 of them getting divorced, several bankruptcies and one of them became an alcoholic. My actions were not done due to misogyny, it was simply a business decision considering what Parker did to me and the risks in the environment at that time. This is what happens when you "believe all women". Judge Parker had a direct hand in my decisions of firing everyone because of what was done to me, my newly falsely label of "wife beater/woman beater" and how any other woman could now accuse me and be immediately believed because I was falsely accused of domestic violence and that was now recorded on court proceedings. I would like to say to judge parker "Pamela, you forced me to make a business decision to fire every single employee, all were women, and your decision to believe the false accusations, let to several divorces, broken families, bankruptcies and one of my female ex-employees becoming an alcoholic. I had no choice due to the risk. Kudos to Judge Parker, what a champion feminist who is actually collaterally ruining innocent women's lives by believing deceitful false accusation sociopathic women in court. She is a foolish and short sighted judge.

Other

Comment #: CA40365
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She has no idea what's in store for her. There is an endless supply of CCP 170.6 headed her way. I would like to take this time to say "Judge Parker, welcome back to the San Diego Central court house Judge".

Other

Comment #: CA40311
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
-responding to 40292

You have not and never been a litigant/respondent/petitioner in Parker's court. A troll is a person who makes excessive remarks in order to make maximum disruption to the argument at hand. This post is for opinions, praise and criticism of Judge Parker by people who have been subject to her rulings or affected by her rulings.You are trying to cause disruption to this post by bringing about completely unrelated subjects not remotely connected to Judge Parker Do you know what that means? it means you are the only troll on this board who is trying to cause disruption to direct reviews of Judge Parker. But then again, no one can have an argument with an irrational person like you. Calling someone a troll is just the projection of your own true personality. I'm not sure you realize this, but You are the troll dear.

Other

Comment #: CA40308
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The poster is referring to AH because AH has ASPD. He/she is trying to show Parker on a public spectacle how a sociopath behaves in court. Only the most hardcore man-haters have taken AH side. [Redacted by Ed.] Regular feminists and victims of domestic abuse, whether make or female, are all berating AH. JD has his own problems. But AH woman is truly evil and should be locked up permanently as her condition is incurable. After this trial is over, you will never see her again. She will go and hide in a house until she dies in what is called a “schizoid” transformation once a narco-path is exposed. Do your research and you will understand. The problem with Parker is that she blindly pro-female and she just doesn’t have the intellect or the knowledge to sniff out the sociopath in her court.

Other

Comment #: CA40297
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
40292- why are you even on this board? you are not even a respondent/petitioner in Parkers court. Your case was in LA. Parker has only worked in San Diego County. Either you are judge parker herself or family or friend. You are blindly making opinions on her without even being exposed to her rulings. You got of remind me of AH family and friends. Do you know what a "flying monkey" is?

Litigant

Other

Comment #: CA39338
Rating:1.0

Comments:
What's with all the whining and complaining? Why are all you men who have been ruined by this woman just keep whining and complaining instead of taking legal action against her? it seems like it's dozens if not hundreds of men out there that have been burned by this man-hating fool of judge. She has full immunity and zero legal repercussions with regards to her rulings. You guys are all wasting your breath, energy and time by complaining here.

You want to know how you can hold her accountable? this is how you do it...

her six year term is almost up, find a candidate to run against her. Then, during the campaign, every single man who has been burned by her and whose rights violated and trampled can bring out the documents showing her misdeeds. Give those documents to the candidate that's running against her so that candidate can use it against her. But, if you pool your resources together (it will only take few hundred dollars each) you can PUBLICIZE THESE DOCUMENTS ON A GRAND SCALE within the court system, journals, San Diego News Papers and San Diego TV stations and her cherished man-hating organizations she is involved in outside her job. YOU MUST MAKE IT GRAND AND IN YOUR FACE.

Here are the two scenarios that will occur afterwards. Either she will lose her bench seat and that will be the end of her career. Or she will win and IT WILL BE FAR WORSE FOR HER. Do you know why it will be worse? Because from then on, the entire San Diego county and every man, woman, lawyer and judge will know what she is because she has been exposed in a "GIANT IN YOUR FACE" on a grand public scale. Personally, I hope she wins her election after she is exposed on a grand scale, because the fall out to her afterwards on the bench will be far worse than if she loses her seat

That's how you get a rid of a bad judge. Not by bad reviews on-line. You expose them publicly on a grand scale. Trust me, the governor will take notice and so will the Commission for Judicial Performance. Even if she win, her professional life will become so miserable that she will be forced to quit.

To the moderator on this board who decides to take down comments, I have said absolutely nothing illegal or defamatory in this comment. Please leave this comment be and don't take it down.

Other

Comment #: CA39272
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
this foolish woman will only understood the damage she is doing to men if she had it done to her own children. But she only has daughters. Hopefully, her daughters will have boys and she will see first hand and feel first hand how her grandsons will be ostracized and abused by the man hating philosophy adopted by other man haters in society. Only then will she "feel" the damage she is causing to other boys, men and fathers. Karma is ruthless. Sooner or later, it comes for you in one way or another. Men are opting out of society and schools. Lets see if you will need men when some tyrant like Putin attacks this country. At that point, men will not fight for women and a society that does not value them. You dont believe me? read history and you will see it has happened multiple times. Women are the foundation of society and if men do not believe in the foundation of their society, they will simply not defend it.

Other

Comment #: CA39249
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
seething, fire breathing, raging, miserable man hater

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA39196
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
To the men out there, this lady has been put on the bench to destroy ON PURPOSE. Make no mistake about it, this woman has been brainwashed and handpicked to be a judge to destroy families and the family unit. Do not confront her, simply just recuse her. If everyone continues to recuse her, they will eventually remove. It has already started and she is gathering a horrendous reputation. And after your divorce, I urge all the men to NEVER get married, EVER.

Litigant

Comment #: CA39144
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Judge Parker, you ruined my life. Linda Alexander played you to get her restraining order from you so she could ruin my chances of getting my child back home. And you fell for it. I don't care about her, I never came close to her and never would. She is harassing ME and seeking me out every way possible. He got me evicted, she tampered with my monitor, my doctor, and fcs. She is constantly looking for my address, I'm not even displaying my work addressand got a po box, just so she can't find ME. And you go and do this to my kid. He lives in a urine soaked home with goat feces everywhere. I know, I sent an inspector there. So, she got her restraining order from you so o look worse than living in a toilet. I can't believe you, you just helped shove a kid further into that shithole environment. You were my most respected judge in vista. Now, you are the woman who ruined my son's future. Shame on you
Dina

Other

Comment #: CA39097
Rating:1.0

Comments:
she is an unfolding live continuous daily disaster

it has become crystal clear that this judges intellect and position is not congruent with her true and accurate qualifications and credentials. Things just do not make sense. She continuous to make the same mistakes over and over again due to one of two reasons. It's either an idealistic fallacy that is preventing her from judging correctly or it's an engrained personality issue she has that is being ignored due to political reasons. I wonder how the repercussions of her existence on the bench are unfolding in the lives of the people affected by his misjudgment.

Other

Other

Comment #: CA37312
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Comment #: CA37308
--> 9/26/2021 **4:04:12 AM; the psycho was up in the middle of the night, writing the psycho post on Judge Parkerm and is exactly like the creep,
threatening, stalker, LASC family lawyer,troll.

..**4:04:12 AM; the psycho was up in the middle of the night, writing the psycho post on Judge Parker... and is exactly like the creepy, threatening, mentally unbalanced, LASC family lawyer, troll, who is in bed with a judge and writes, psycho posts--against opponents, the truth and to deflect from truthful posts aboutnhis wrongdoings , with the judge he is in bed with and their LASC family law cabal and LASC family lawyer troll, who is in bed with an equally disrepute judge and cabal, targets opponents and other judges, to distract from the truth, truthful posts--look at the eeerily creepy similarites, and the timing of when these posts are written and posted....

...LASC family law dept. has such a group of disrepute, judges and the creepy, cheating, lying, crooked lawyers they are in bed with, who are not very bright, not clever, lawful, or erhical, these family law judges and lawyers... and the victims of these type of abusive. troll judges and lawyers, will continue to call them out; and call out their lawlessness and harm and truth to power.

Other

Comment #: CA37308
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I know this might look bad and I would usually feel bad about feeling this way with other people, but when it comes to this judge, I don’t feel bad at all about the following since age such a horrible person and a worse judge. So here it goes:

I keep smiling and laughing when I see her miserable and angry. She is angrier and more miserable year after year. And My smile gets bigger and laughters louder year after year. Look at her face and her angry eyes and mouth. It seems she has poison and acid in her blood. Does she realize that she is causing the misery all by herself? She might think she is respected. But that’s only said to her face. Everyone makes fun of this old woman behind her back and she is the butt of so many jokes. The people I feel sorry for are her husband and children. They have to put up with this miserable wretch. Must be absolute hell. But she deserves every bit of it.

Other

Comment #: CA37017
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA33123
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
responding to CA33122:

"protects women and victims of domestic violence"......thanks for confirming that she is despicably pro-female.....
people who are on her side are admitting she is pro-female. Feminism is based on equal opportunity. Feminism is not pro-female. Parker is not a feminist. Parker is a unjust and bias. She doesn't belong on the bench.

Other

Comment #: CA33085
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Could Judge Parker have been the person who came up with the #METOO movements "believe women"?

Really? Believe ALL of them? My puny male brain didn't realize women are incapable of lying and manipulation. How wrong I have been all these years thinking that women are also human. Apparently, according to Judge parker, it has now been proven to me that women are these pure heavenly angels and also I am just finding out that I, a male, am responsible for all the evil in the world. Oh boy!!! Boy, I must have been living under a rock. Thank god I'm enlightened now.

If Pamela parker presides over the Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp trial in United states, who do you think will be found credible?....take a wild guess....Amber

Parker doesn't have the ability to decipher who the female sociopath is in her court. Why is this angry man hater still on the bench?

Pamela, Do us all a favor and resign.

Other

Comment #: CA32849
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This woman is an insecure raging man-hating tyrant bully who thinks she cant be held legally responsible due to judicial immunity. Most people think that judges are completely immune. But that's not the case at all.In 1984, the United States supreme court has ruled that State judges can be sued and held liable for legal fees if they violate the petitioner/respondent civil rights. For civil rights violations, Judges can absolutely get nailed, exposed and eventually removed due to political pressure and bad reputation.

She can absolutely be held legally liable for her atrocious tyrannical rulings. The men on this forum and the ones reading this forum should come together and pool all their complaints and file all theirs lawsuits against her in federal court. She needs to be removed from the bench. She is not fit to be a judge due to her gender bias and ineptitude.

There is a four year statute of limitation on Civil right violation. If you file a civil rights lawsuit against her while she is presiding on your case, she might retaliate against you or have the black robed gavel wielding judicial gang retaliate against you. So here is my advice, wait until your divorce is completed no matter how much pain and destruction she causes you, then file against her in federal court. If there are dozens of filings against her, no matter how much the system tries to protect her, a couple out of those dozens will get through and she will eventually be held accountable.

To all the men, don't let these man hating insecure judges violate your civil rights. Band together and take down these tyrants from their thrones. They need to understand that no one is above the law.

Other

Comment #: CA32739
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
you gotta be kidding? right?

to comment CA32710

I have seen with my own eyes females in her court who confessing to felonies under oath while on the stand, and she completely dismisses the confession of that person just because they are female. If the coalition for judicial performance audit 50 random sample of her cases, once they see how Parker rules based on complete nonsense, they will ask her to resign.

So I ask you, how can someone "actually do her job fairly" if she dismisses the blatant confession of felonies under oath from females and yet crucifies men without any evidence.

She does follow fact alright. The only facts she follows is her "opinion" when she labels someone "not credible" without any evidence just to rule againt them. Once she labels someone not credible. Then it becomes "demeanor based fact" which is absolute nonsense. It's willy nilly judging just because a witness might have a twitch in his eye or runny nose. And take a wild guess which gender the "not credible" individual is 99% of the time?...any clue?.....MALE

Let me guess, CA32710, you are a female family law attorney, right?

Other

Comment #: CA32674
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Under federal law, judges can not invoke immunity if they have violated the petitioner/respondent or plaintiff/defendant civil rights.

Thus, if she has committed civil right violations, she can be sued and held liable for damanges.

If you guys are sure she has continuously violated multitude of people's civil rights, then she can be sued, held liable and potentially removed from the bench in disgrace.

Other

Comment #: CA32659
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
All parties in her courtroom can clearly see the seething fury within her bias rulings . This judicial officer does not have the peace of mind or the mental clarity to make sound judgements and rulings between divorcing parties.

She does not seem to know and/or care that many people are realizing her inherent negative demeanor and female bias.

She seems to be suffering from "female entitlement syndrome" just as the females she continues to be ruling in favor of.

I can only speculate that she is profoundly miserable and disappointed in her personal and/or professional life.

Other

Comment #: CA32604
Rating:1.0

Other

Comment #: CA32383
Rating:1.0

Comments:
There is no doubt about it, she is pro-female and anti-male. Unfortunately, in the long run, her pro-female agenda ends up hurting the female far more than the male. She just doesn't see it or realize it or she would have ruled justly to protect women. It's comical.

Comment #: CA32091
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Well well, isn’t that surprising?

When you call out someone’s nonsense by pointing out facts, then suddenly it seems as if they are projecting their own misdeeds on others

Hey Judge Parker, You wanna know who is violating the Bane act? Walk over to the bathroom mirror and look in it. Your “honor”, you ARE the reason they came up with the Bane act, to put a stop to people like you

Maybe Pam should report herself to for violating the Bane act.

There is only one child here that needs pampers. It’s the girl who has remained an emotionally stunted 4 year old and throws tantrums every time she doesn’t like what she hears. Sorry, can’t ride daddy’s legacy to victory on this one.

Becoming a judge was her biggest downfall.

Other

Comment #: CA32090
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Is “lawyers club of San Diego” privately funded, state funded or federally funded?

Is “ the 6 year election mark” for a judge campaign finance privately funded, state funded or federally funded?

Is the state funds that pay for judges salaries subsidized federally or privately by the title 4D of social security act? Does the federal government incentivize funds for state government by screwing men out of their fatherhood by giving the kids to the “usually” less earning mother despite the malicious behavior of females in court that they are not held accountable for?

The Bane act quotes don’t mean anything when Judical branch is in bed with the executive branch.

You talk about justice?....shame on you

Other

Comment #: CA32088
Rating:1.0

Comments:
are you referring to Bane from Batman, the Dark Knight rises? Bane and his act was awesome

Bane: "do you feel in charge"?
Daggett "I paid you a small fortune"
Bane: "and this gives you power over me?"
Daggett "what is this?"
Bane "your money and infrastructure has been important, until now"
Daggett: "what are you?"
Bane: "I'm Gotham's reckoning. Here to end the borrowed time you all have been living on."
Daggett: "you're pure evil"

Is that the Bane act you are referring to? I love this Bane act, it's a great scene

Other

Comment #: CA32082
Rating:1.0

Comments:
here is a suggestion

last night on SNL, the host gave a monologue about people just like her, she should watch it and listen to it

the guy was slaying on SNL

comedians and feminists are natural enemies like lions and hyenas, do you know who they call the "king of the jungle"? the male lion (comedian) who dominates the sisterhood of hyenas (feminists)

nature will always unfold as it should, the feminist movement will go down in history just like communism

parker is fighting a losing battle, nature is the only opponent undefeated, thus....she is a loser

Litigant

Comment #: CA32037
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Even if you show this judge a live film of the murderer stabbing or shooting the victim, she can not determine who the murderer is. Even if the suspect is standing there with horns and a pitch fork, she can not distinguish the evil sociopath standing in front of her. In fact, most of the time, she rules against the victim and for the blatantly clear criminal in her court. How the heck did she become a judge? It wont be long until she is exposed to be a complete fool and a greatly incompetent and damaging judge. She must be taken off the bench as soon as possible. I can say, with relative certainly, that her Judgement IQ is near zero. I find it mind boggling that she has virtually no insight and judgement in who the criminal is. Thus, in addition to being an overt man hater, she is also virtually incapable of determining who the sociopath or psychopath is her court.

Comment #: CA30542
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She is eerily similar to Cathy Newman who is a British journalist and reporter. The fathers and husbands have no chance in her court. There is No way she would have been appointed as judge if her true man hating nature was discovered earlier.

Other

Comment #: CA28533
Rating:1.0

Comments:
she looks miserable and beat up, it seems like she is not happy with her own life and is taking it out on anyone and everyone in the court room

being a miserable angry lawyer is oftentimes acceptable and the legal system has a place for those kinds of lawyers, but being a judge with those qualities is not acceptable and not conducive to appropriate justice

I believe she is a housewife misplaced to be a judge, something went wrong in her childhood, maybe being was neglected and/o was spoiled

I don't think anyone will remove her from the bench, but it doesn't matter, bringing that kind of personality to the bench is self sabotaging and self destructive to her own professional and personal life

the ire of the people at the end of her injustice is really not needed, her conduct is far more destructive to herself than the objections of the victims in her court

Other

Comment #: CA28425
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Sorry excuse for a judge. She is terrible

Litigant

Comment #: CA28143
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
After representing several men in front of this judge and how this man destroyer savagely tore apart my completely innocent clients and destroyed their lives because of her toxic feminist ideology, for the first time in my life, I am voting for a Republican governor and a republican president, even if it's Trump. The pendulum against men has gone too far and now innocent men are being hurt. I am ashamed I voted for Governor Brown who appointed this toxic judge. The METOO movement has backfired.

The world owes an apology to Johnny Depp. Amber Heard should be behind bars.

Comment #: CA12241
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
My only income was alimony. I have had Parkinson's disease for 13 years. My ex retired from a $150,000 + salary. Judge Parker ruled that my alimony be reduced to $500 per month. She said I should sell my home. $500 pays for my medical & dental. Apparently she has no idea of the cost of living.

Other

Comment #: CA11974
Rating:1.0

Comments:
This judge destroyed my children's future and didn't follow the law in any way. We had solid proof showing my Ex-wife and her family was constantly telling lies and she laughed it off. She was not a fair or resonable judge by any means. Worst judge I have ever had an experience with. If you get assigned to her do whatever you can to get a different judge.

Litigant

Comment #: CA11941
Rating:1.0

Comments:
She is absolutely horrible.
Unfortunately I have been involved in the SD family court process since late 2012 and Judge Parker is the WORST judge I have experienced! She rules by the seat of her pants and does not seem to know or care about court rules! Judge Miller was taking over for Judge Parker recently and she was GREAT ...fare, just and worked at fining happy medium in her rulings and keep needs of children front and center. I pray that Judge Miller permanently takes over for Judge Parker!

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA11819
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Worst judge I have ever seen. She reverses decisions, doesn't hold people accountable to not showing up to court, takes sides without any evidence, is scared to take action, heavily against people in recovery. Completely unfair and has ruined the past multiple years of my life!!! Wish I had other judge who saw completely through my ex in 10 minutes.

Comment #: CA6155
Rating:10.0

Comments:
I really liked Judge Parker. She seemed fair and willing to give the litigants time to present their side. She also has a very keen BS meter and often used it to admonish people who were getting out of control in the courtroom. I love how she would put my husband's ex-wife in her place when the ex-wife would get histrionic and start telling lies that anyone could see through. I went to observe her before she heard my husband's case, and I was very very impressed with how she showed compassion and insight into people's situations, and really tried to bring about the most fair and compassionate result. She is a much better judge than Judge Huguenor, who was, quite frankly, a disaster, as she was incompetent, old and tired and obviously didn't care about the best interests of the children or the parties. She would just rubber stamp whatever the female litigant would demand, without any discernment, anything to get the people out of the courtroom. My husband is still trying to recover from the damage that Judge Huguenor brought not only to his relationships with his children, but also to his finances. He will NEVER get back the years that Judge Huguenor, through her incompetence and laziness, took away from him and his children. Judge Parker is a breath of fresh air by comparison; bright, compassionate, truly committed to bringing about the best and most fair result. I am sorry to see her go.

Other

Comment #: CA5626
Rating:2.0

Comments:
New Judge. Doesn't seem to know what she is doing. Easily falls prey to Narcissist's charm at the peril of innocent parties. Needs to be better educated or go back to the PTA.