"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Susanne S Cho	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Riverside County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 1.9 - 1 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 3 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Susanne S Cho

Comments

Other

Comment #: CA54300
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Suzanne Cho does not look at evidence, she just keeps extending cases and sadly I watched her be manipulated by my abuser to the point she made him to be the victim when really he was the abuser. Had she looked at evidence this would not have happened. It’s very concerning.

Other

Comment #: CA53332
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Susanna Cho doesn’t follow the law. She is very aggressive, unfair and unjust . She treats poor people like they don’t have constitutional rights. In my case she didn’t look any evidence provided at court, allowed abusing part to do more abuse & damages. She damages the life of poor, not guilty people. She doesn’t care about justice, retaliate people if you keep her accountable to follow the law. Very biased. Discriminates immigrants.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA48685
Rating:1.9

Comments:
Doesn't seem to read pleadings, seems to have female bias based on more than one appearance, shoots from the hip, does not make rulings which conform to law

Other

Comment #: CA39717
Rating:1.0

Comments:
Disregards the law. States openly no one has constitutional rights in her court room. Ruins families for sport. And blames the victims for her actions. Will always side with CPS. Gets joy in causing the most deep soul crushing pain a family should never feel. No oversight because it involves minors so no one holds her accountable. If I could I would rate her -100000000000

Litigant

Comment #: CA31551
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Cho shows such disregard for the law, it comes off as if she is the omnipotent queen, that she is somehow above laws meant for petty commoners. She doesn’t even sign her orders so she can go back six months later and modify them when it becomes painfully obvious just how wrong her decisions were.