Hon. Julian C. Recana See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   2.6 - 1 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Julian C. Recana


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA54933
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
I did not get an opportunity to present my evidence for a fair ruling ruling and rendered unjust enrichment, deprivation under color. I am going to request that Julian Recana come back and fix the ERRORS AND L0W STANDARDS OF REVIEW. I BELIEVE HE SHOULD HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW THAT HIS RULING WAS NOT THE INTENT OF LEGISLATURE TO ALLOW HIM SUBMIT A BIASE RULING AND MALPRACTICE OF JUSTICE,AND INCOMPETENCE

Civil Litigation - Govt.

Comment #: CA54932
Rating:2.6
Comments:
Mr.Julian Recana what is your location and all contact information for a submission of a SUBPEONA AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY. THIS IS ROBERT CITIZEN V. WALTON AUTO WRECKING AND TOWING REGARDING CASE NUMBER 23CMSC00034 THAT YOU VACATED AND SET ASIDE KNOWING THAT THE RULING THAT YOU GAVE TO THE DEFENDANT WITH MORE THAN 3 NON COMPLIANECE WITH FAILURE TO APPEAR EVEN A FAILURE TO APPEAR FROM YOU. AS I CAN TELL YOU ARE THE SECOND COMMISSIONER THAT HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE ME WITH REMEDY WITHOUT A VERFICATION OF A VALID CALIFORNIA BAR LICENSE. BECAUSE ALLOWED YOU TO PRESIDE OVER THIS COURT MATTER I HAVE SUFFERED DAMAGES. I BELIEVE MY ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS TO PROVIDE MY OWN REMEDY AND RELIEF IS A NON-JUDICIAL COMMON LAW COMMERCIAL LIEN FOR $250,000 DOLLARS AND THE RETURN OF MY CAR FULLY RESTORED FOR DAMAGES OF NON USE, AND SENTAMENTAL VALUE FROM MY MOTHER JUST TO NAME A FEW. YOU CAN REMEDY THIS SITUATION BY RETURNING MY PROPERTY WITHIN 30 AND A RESPONCE WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE RECEIPT OF MY DISCOVERY REQUEST TO PREVENT C