Hon. Jonathan L Rosenbloom See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   1.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 3 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Jonathan L Rosenbloom


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA50711
Rating:1.4
Comments:
170.6 this judge immediately now that he is in Dept 11.
Do not have a conservatorship matter in front of him.

Litigant

Comment #: CA48243
Rating:1.0
Comments:
This judge's temperament is substantially below what it should be. He recently threatened an 80-year-old woman with sanctions because she wanted to be heard about why her son should not have a conservatorship over her person and estate. He also threatened her daughter with sanctions for opposing the conservatorship petition. He said medical records were inadmissible hearsay and had to be reminded about the business records exception. Although original jurisdiction is questionable, he issued orders basically imprisoning the woman by ruling that she can't leave Los Angeles County until the next hearing date. There is no mental capacity declaration on file.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA41360
Rating:1.0
Comments:
If you're not familiar with LA Probate immediately 170.6 this judge. He is extremely biased toward the attorneys that he knows. If you're one of the attorneys he likes, he will violate the law to help you. If you're not an attorney he likes, your clients will suffer.

Other

Comment #: CA37890
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Don't go before this judge if you can help it. He is biased. If you get him, ask to have him changed. If you make an appearance before him and he hears your case, it might be impossible to get rid of him until he might ruin your life.
As a member of a minority group, I feel that he shares the same innate hate for certain groups, whether he intends to discriminate or not. Your option might include filing form 170.1 by which you ask him to remove himself from the case. You could also contact The California Commission On Judicial Performance. I don't know which one of his friends made one of the comments here, but I agree with the other litigant. This judge is DEFINITELY biased. Stay away from Dept 79 in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles Downtown.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA35510
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Judge Rosenbloom is not biased towards self-represented litigants. Unless you are a complete and utter shill the deficit of knowledge, protocol, and experience makes it nearly impossible for a pro per to prevail against an attorney. I would imagine if an attorney stepped into the ring with a professional boxer the attorney might be a distinct disadvantage but the judges need not be biased to determine the outcome.

Other

Comment #: CA35500
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Biased towards self represented litigants