"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Frederick S Chung	See Rating Details
Judge Superior Court
Santa Clara County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 6.4 - 2 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: 1.0 - 1 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Frederick S Chung

Comments

Litigant

Comment #: CA54452
Rating:1.0

Comments:
The most incomptentent judge of the Court made a deterimination as an appellate Panel the trial judge had no jurisdiction to enter an Ex Paret Order and refused to report the illegal conduct to the Judcial Perfromance Commission in violation of Canon 3 D 1 & 2

Now my case against the Superior Court has been ordered to none binding mediation over the Courts violations of the ADA Act with actual acts of retailations for damages

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA49146
Rating:3.9

Comments:
If you are a plaintiff faced with a dispositive motion (demurrer, motion for summary judgment) this is the time to exercise your ccp 170.6; this judge was a civil defense lawyer his entire career and has not yet drained the bias. He is exclusively disposed to help insurance defense counsel in any way he can including not following the law and ignoring the facts of your case-do not roll the dice with this Judge and disqualify him-he is the worst judge you could be assigned to, any other judge in that courthouse will give you a fair hearing.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA48558
Rating:9.0

Comments:
This Judge is a complete idiot who stated in his opinion that the "Court has sole discretion to tp deny a hearing impaired defendant his rights to communicate with cout appointed legal counsel because under a State Supreme court decision holds that a California curt can deny a criminal defendant his federal constitutional right legal represenation