"The Robing Room: CA State Judges

Hon. Amir Ahronov	See Rating Details
Commissioner Superior Court
Los Angeles County	See Comments

Attorney Average Rating: 4.5 - 3 rating(s) Non-Attorney Average Rating: - 0 rating(s)	Please send me alerts on this judge E-mail Address:

Add your own rating

E-Mail Address ()

* *

Confirm E-mail Address

* * *

Zip

Occupation

Add a comment only

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.

General Rating Criteria

* Temperament		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness		(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation		(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality		(1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge		(1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling		(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)

Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation		(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail		(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage		(1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)

Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation		(1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions		(1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination		(1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)

Comments

Please type what you see below:

Not an even number!

What others have said about Hon. Amir Ahronov

Comments

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA54605
Rating:9.1

Comments:
I've had the privilege to litigate in front of the commissioner many times. He is a tough judicial officer because he has high expectations but they are not out-landish. He expects attorney's to know their case and be prepared to litigate it. He is very even-handed with pro per litigants. The other comments are not the Commissioner Ahronov that I have seen over and over again.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA53877
Rating:3.0

Comments:
Arrogant. Condescending and demeaning to attorneys and litigants. Favors mothers. Prejudges cases, applying outcome determinate reasoning to reach the predetermined a conclusion born out of pure bias. Any wise litigant or attorney would not stipulate to have their matter heard by this commissioner. He has no business being on the bench.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA49183
Rating:1.4

Comments:
He is condescending, arrogant, and interrupts both parties and counsel repeatedly. He hijacked the hearing multiple times, asking direct exam, and cross exam, of the witnesses, as if he were litigating the case, not judging it. Then after asking his own questions, he complains that you are not using time wisely. He is misogynistic at best and should not be wearing the robe.