Hon. Kristen Byrdsong See Rating Details
Commissioner
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   1.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Kristen Byrdsong


Comments


Litigant

Comment #: CA56122
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Echoing other comments on here, this commissioner ignored evidence and case law that strongly disputed the county's false claims, that rested solely on the heresay of the father's testimony. Evidence of substantial efforts taken by mother to improve herself were completely ignored, as though the past 3 months of work were non-existent. Just hope that you dont get this hack, who embodies the definition of a kangaroo commissioner (not an actual judge).

Other

Comment #: CA55682
Rating:1.0
Comments:
She is a terrible judge. Did not let me share my side of the story but allowed the fathers. I truly believe it was prejudice. She made my child cry with her rude remarks. She ruled based on lies and refused to see proof of the truth about the lies that were told in court.

Other

Comment #: CA54584
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Rude and blatantly disrespectful.