Hon. Patricia A Young See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Los Angeles County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   4.3 - 3 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   5.0 - 2 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Patricia A Young


Comments


Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA56127
Rating:1.0
Comments:
I appeared before Judge Young in a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) matter and was deeply concerned by the apparent bias demonstrated toward my client, even prior to the presentation of any testimony. Despite the relevance of certain evidence, Judge Young refused to admit it, preventing the introduction of material that would have shown the Petitioner’s attempt to fabricate their case in order to gain undue control over their children and the family home.

As an attorney committed to the principles of fairness and justice, I find the conduct exhibited by Judge Young to be highly troubling. The bias and lack of respect she showed toward my client raises serious questions regarding her impartiality. I strongly urge the State Bar to conduct a thorough review of her conduct and the cases over which she has presided. If her actions are found to be in violation of ethical standards, appropriate disciplinary measures, including the potential revocation of her law license, should be considered.

Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA55408
Rating:1.9
Comments:
Judge Young, if you are reading this, please study covert narcissism and please believe the child when they say they are being abused, and place them with their safe parent. If you’re not sure, please don’t guess. Order a custody evaluation and/or minor’s counsel to be the child’s voice.

Litigant

Comment #: CA55034
Rating:1.0
Comments:
Extremely biased and once she makes an opinion about you, there is nothing you can do to change that. She also ignores tangible evidence of perjury and if she doesn't like you, will take the side of the other person no matter how much evidence you provide to prove the other party is lying.
She also favors women and shows clear distain towards men in her court room. I sat in her courtroom for an entire day and in every case, you could see her take whatever the woman said as fact, and ignored anything the man said even though it was supported with actual evidence.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54995
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
The dishonorable judge Young is completely biased against men and no matter how much evidence you present she will side with a female who is proven to lie and has no evidence of their claims.

She should be removed from the bench immediately and all her previous cases retried.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54768
Rating:10.0
Comments:
You are lucky if you get this judge! She absolutely knows the law so if you have an ex who is trying to pull nonsense, you can rest assured that she will see through it. I wish all judges were this knowledgeable and unbiased.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA54081
Rating:10.0
Comments:
Intelligent, no nonsense jurist who handles litigants fairly. If you're complaining, you probably didn't show up prepared.

Litigant

Comment #: CA54031
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
Abusive. Incompetent.

Litigant

Comment #: CA52264
Rating:Not Rated
Comments:
makes no effort to be reasonable. makes decisions before hearing case and wont change mind. allows counsel she is friendly/familiar with to grandstand while preventing the opposition from speaking.