Hon. Keith Fong See Rating Details
Judge
Superior Court
Alameda County
See Comments

Attorney Average Rating:   3.2 - 2 rating(s)
Non-Attorney Average Rating:   - 0 rating(s)
Please send me alerts on this judge
E-mail Address:




Add your own rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed)
Confirm E-mail Address
Zip
Occupation

Only items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating.


General Rating Criteria

* Temperament (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Scholarship (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
* Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful,10=Excellent)
* Punctuality (1=Chronically Late,10=Always on Time)
* General Ability to Handle Pre-Trial Matters (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
* General Ability as a Trial Judge (1=Not all Able, 10=Extremely Able)
Flexibility In Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)


Criminal Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Plea Discussions (1=Not at all Involved, 10=Very Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pretrial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing Stage (1=Pro-prosecution,10=Pro-defense)


Civil Rating Criteria (if applicable)

* Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Not at all Evenhanded,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Involvement in Settlement Discussions (1=Not at all Involved,10=Very Involved)
General Inclination (1=Pro-defendant, 10=Pro-plaintiff)
Comments


Please type what you see below:

  

What others have said about Hon. Keith Fong


Comments


Criminal Defense Lawyer

Comment #: CA55788
Rating:5.4
Comments:
Judge Fong is Judge Wrong because he makes occasional serious legal errors that clearly contravene the law as well as legal doctrines. There's really no excuse for some of these legal errors. I understand there are many instances where some of the facts and even the law can be confusing. I know Judge Fong is a new judge and perhaps that accounts for some of his errors. On the other hand, Judge Fong has been practicing law for over 30 years. I also know most judges are extremely busy and perhaps they overlook some points n the pleadings. I can't wait for AI to come to the rescue and perhaps in the future there weon't be so many of these serious legal errors.

Civil Litigation - Private

Comment #: CA54435
Rating:1.0
Comments:
` Truly awful at our restraining order hearing. Entertained ex parte arguments from the other side--which he admitted at the hearing--does he know he's not supposed to do that?